this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
327 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

71800 readers
4219 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 85 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Why would anyone want to watch AI generated content? What's the point? I get using AI generation as a tool but if there's no human intention behind it, just a pure algorithm, why even bother?

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago

Because now there literally will be infinite content for doom scrolling addicts.

I've watched some mildly amusing Yeti campfire tutorials that were AI generated.

E.g. https://youtube.com/shorts/H2M0rSW9jhk

[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 52 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Sometimes I'll watch a video and as soon as I realize the voice is AI generated, I stop watching

[–] MiyamotoKnows@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This was me once a month but now it's a few times a day.

[–] M137@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Really? I very rarely come across it, and I use YouTube a lot. But when I do come across it I select "don't recommend channel again" and dislike the video.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

You already clicked. It doesn't matter anymore.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 2 points 4 hours ago

I've clicked, but I have an ad-blocker, so... YouTube gained nothing from that.

[–] hikaru755@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago

Watch time is pretty important on YouTube afaik, initial clocks themselves don't count for that much

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

But why?

Like sure some of the voices are not great but the words being said are the thing I’m interested in and not the person / machine saying the words.

Each to their own and all that, I’m just curious as to why you just stop watching something you were seemingly enjoying.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If nobody bothered to make it why should anybody bother to watch it?

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Signals to me that maybe the creator isn’t comfortable with their voice or maybe they can’t speak or have a stutter, but they still have something to say.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Recognising the "AI voice" isn't just the voice. It's also the clearly "written by AI" circuitous script that keeps talking without saying anything and non-stop clickbait "but wait until you find out what the answer is" crap.

The other type of AI voice is people just stealing Reddit stories and putting them to AI. Also lame. I want my stories narrated with human emotion. The point of stories isn't to transfer knowledge, it's an art form, I don't need shitty robot emotions thank you very much.

So no, the use case for AI voice is very narrow. Some of my favorite YouTubers use text narration. Maybe they don't like their voice, or speak a different language, I don't know, I've literally never heard them. It doesn't stop them in the least from showing me amazing things. They don't need to resort to polluting their video with the lowest garbage idea humans have created so far.

I'd like to see a video that is improved by the use of any AI.

You’ve given a lot more context and use cases here that you oppose and I would agree with them for the most part, but I would push back on the people using text narration switching to an AI voice as a natural progression as the tool becomes more useful.

As for seeing a video that has been improved by AI I would hazard a guess you’re already watching them, if you think creators are not using LLMs to improve their workflow and efficiency then you’d be mistaken.

I can’t comment on any specifics but our company of software engineers have saved that many man hours from LLM integration, as a tool not just write code for us, that me and my 5 colleagues all got a pay rise and a reduction of weekly hours at the same time. So based on this I would assume that if used correctly and responsibly I don’t see why people in other industries can’t use the tool for similar benefits.

[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Because it signal to me that the content is low quality and untrustworthy

Signals to me that maybe the creator isn’t comfortable with their voice or maybe they can’t speak or have a stutter, but they still have something to say.

[–] EighteenthNerd@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Because it's a sign to me that the content creator is willing to take shortcuts and be lazy. In which case I take the shortcut to being too lazy to watch their "content".

I like to approach things in life with positive intent, so seeing a video with an AI voice to me would make me assume that perhaps they don’t have a great voice or that they have a stammer so so an Ai voice allows them to still make content they want to.

I find that life is a lot better if you assume the best in people rather than assume the worse. And I can tell you that since I’ve taken this approach I’m a much happier person and it’s extremely rare that I give positive intent to someone with bad intentions so worth it for less stress and worrying about things all the time.

Do you think the same of channels that pay someone else to be the face of the channel or is it just Ai voices you have issue with?

[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Art is people making stuff, without the people... it's just stuff.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago

Unpopular opinion: the fact that said stuff matches my style / that I like it is what makes art worth anything to me. Being made by a person or a fish or a machine doesnt matter. It's the STUFF I want on my wall or the end table, not the fact that it's tacitly human crafted. Any art I can afford is made by someone who is basically a faceless deal, not someone I know personally (or else the person matters) or someone who is famous (in which the person matters). Ergo... the people don't typically matter.

Im not going to an insane restaurant to fanboy the chef, I'm going to eat the FOOD. If a machine makes it and every single dish is atomically identical, that's fine, as long as it's super tasty.

[–] sykaster@feddit.nl 6 points 22 hours ago

Can still be very pretty though. I use it to set scenes and show characters for my dungeons and dragons campaign.

[–] pezhore@infosec.pub 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not like you can learn from it (even if the topic is something you'll never use like a 2 hour dissertation on heat pumps or a multi-video series on how an old pinball machine uses only relays to calculate scores).

Why yes, I am subscribed to Technology Connections, how could you tell?

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love heat pumps I love heat pumps I love heat pumps

(I agree! I do love tech connections. Although I'd argue that knowing how heat pumps work can be quite beneficial ^^ at least in my case)

[–] Coldcell@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 hours ago

I have no idea what this vibe is, but I would like to subscribe.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I subscribed to him as well. His Patreon is even better.

[–] pezhore@infosec.pub 5 points 1 day ago

I've been meaning to add his patreon. I have too many as it is and need to call a bit, but I just feel guilty about it.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

There’s an example right in the article.

Historical events portrayed realistically is one.

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Although there is nothing realistic about it all. But it satisfies the expectations of someone who doesn't know anything about history.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

Delete your account.

[–] EighteenthNerd@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

Which is the second most scary thing AI can do.

The first is realistic portrayal of faked current events.