this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
649 points (92.2% liked)
childfree
2351 readers
7 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I... don't know, man, the info that she died is right there in the headline. I'm struggling to compose that sentence in English without using the word "left".
"Police rescue baby alone for days after mother dies" doesn't sound like English. "Police rescue baby alone after mother dies" sounds like the news is the baby doesn't have any other family and also sounds weird.
If you take motherhood out of it altogether it becomes more obvious, I suppose. "The man was left alone on a deserted island after the rest of the plane's crew died in the crash" is a perfectly valid way to frame that.
Blame English for using adjectives weird sometimes.
'Police rescue baby found alone after mother dies days earlier'
Not a native speaker, but it sounds off to me.
That's what you got out of this? That she's raging against babies and not against a system that forces women to give birth but does nothing to support mothers or their children afterwards?
ETA: oh wait you're that same fucking pronatalist cockthistle that's been crawling all over this post. Hail Satan, and have a lovely afternoon.
I've no idea what he commented, but raging against the system while reasonable by itself might or might not be related to this particular story.
We only know that a woman died and in the wake of that a baby had no one to take care of them for a few days, which is tragic but doesn't mean that particular woman was forced to have a baby she didn't want or didn't have the level of support that one would have expected her to need, we just don't have details.
So one totally hypothetical narrative that also fits the information as given:
You can of course have a narrative more consistent with the complaint about lack of support:
Or the mother had some medical condition that was undiagnosed due to lack of money to attend.
All of the stories are possible, and real examples of the supporting scenarios can be readily found, but we can't assume this specific incident is part of that narrative with details as scant as this. Assuming unspecified facts to fit a narrative can lead to a credibility issue if subsequent details show that none of those actually applied in this situation.
https://www.azag.gov/issues/reproductive-rights/laws
So what’s this about being forced to give birth?
You know there's an entire country outside of Arizona, right?
You understand this is in the context of the woman dying in Phoenix, Arizona?
You have been implying that she was or could have been forced to give birth.
Given the age of the child the constitutional amendment had already been passed, meaning you have made misleading statements.