this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
169 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

72360 readers
2807 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orclev@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The problem is that the biggest service Cloudflare provides is DDoS protection, and doing that requires that you have more bandwidth available than your attacker. Having enough bandwidth to withstand modern botnet powered DDoS attacks is ridiculously expensive (and it's also a finite resource, there's only so much backbone infrastructure). Basically it's economically infeasible to have multiple companies providing the service Cloudflare does. You might be able to get away with two companies doing so, but it's unlikely you could manage more than that without some of them starting to go bankrupt.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

when a critical service is not economical for more than one business to do (natural monopoly), that's when govt should be stepping in.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Which govt? I'm not comfortable with the idea of the current US govt having control over this sort of service.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

are you comfortable with a single corporation having control over this sort of service? the current government is obviously not ideal but that shouldn’t stop us from regulating monopolies.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago

are you comfortable with a single corporation having control over this sort of service?

Honestly? A tiny bit more than a single country. I have at least some miniscule control over the corporation through voting and local regulations that international corporations must follow, whereas I have absolutely no formal influence on US govt.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wonder if it would be a good investment for a country to have their own then down the line expand to sell the same service to others

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago

It's OurFlare, comrade.