this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
227 points (100.0% liked)

196

17534 readers
574 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

look for anarchists if you desire a classless, stateless, moneyless society.

communism has been coopted by auth apologists infatuated with the color red.

[–] kartonrealista@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (7 children)

But what if I'm not an anarchist? I like Marx but not Lenin, so I can't be an ML either.

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/david-graeber-are-you-an-anarchist-the-answer-may-surprise-you

anarchism acknowledges Marxist theory, but rejects the need for a state/beaurocratic apparatus, as it is considered to be fundamentally oppressive.

the state is an abstraction of capital, and cannot liberate the working class, as it exists to perpetuate its own hegemonic existence, our subjugation.

governance need not be heirarchichal; I promote collective mutual determination as an egalitarian system by which society can organize.

can't dismantle the master's house with the master's tools

[–] archon@dataterm.digital 2 points 2 years ago

I promote collective mutual determination as an egalitarian system by which society can organize.

In practice, direct democracy? Or, how would that work - how would we organize society? Positions would still need to be held, no? Roles appointed, decisions made, lines drawn. No one can be up-to-date on all matters in their local nor global environment. And certainly not at the same point in time. How would anything work with any cohesiveness?

Sorry to be so dismissive, I'm actually kinda curious on your thoughts. Only ways I see are AI governance or a hive mind. Not sure about either tbh.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)