447
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
447 points (98.7% liked)
Fuck Cars
12674 readers
764 users here now
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I find the framing of the (potential) negatives interesting. Not worse, too soon to say, holding up
I don't think it's about framing and more about that's just what there is to say about them.
Worsening traffic outside the area was a main concern of congestion pricing, so "Not worse" is actually the best case scenario.
"Too soon to say" if pollution decreased is not really a potential negative. It has decreased but it's literally just too soon to say if it had anything to do with the policy or if it's just a fluke. It needs to stay consistently lower than in the surrounding areas to say, for sure, that it's due to the policy.
They also looked at the number of visitors in the area and theater capacity and found it's a little higher than last year but within margin of error so they can't say it's worse but also can't say it's better so "Holding up" is as transparent as it gets. Some business owners have said that it hurt their business, so there's that.