this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
481 points (97.1% liked)
Progressive Politics
3077 readers
679 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They're a common sense accessory; they make guns safer for the hearing of everyone around. That said, having 27 is silly. I won't begrudge someone an odd collection, though. Some people collect Magic Cards.
Right, there is no valid argument that is based on reality, not Hollywood fantasy, for restricting suppressors or taxing suppressors, a literal safety device. It's like restricting and taxing airbags on a car.
Automakers trying to make airbags a subscription: furious note taking
I'd say its more akin to restricting muffler use on cars. Instead, we usually place upper limits on how loud a car's exhaust can be. Hearing protection is important and muffler/suppressor use should be encouraged.
Plot twist: He doesn't own any guns. He just likes silencers.
It's a quiet hobby
Got all different sizes so he can play them like pan pipes.
With disappointing results!
You should hear his perfect rendition of John Cage's 4'33".
Dude works in a gun store, guns are obviously his hobby. I collect old, shitty shotguns. Love the gunsmithing and woodworking challenges.
If I had the means, almost every one I own would have a suppressor. The deafening noise is the worst part of shooting, by a long shot (heh).
I need 27 suppressors for my 27 guns. Ever thought of that? Didn't think so.
And why do I need 27 guns? That's right, for my 27 hands. Betcha feel real silly now, huh buster?
That's RIGHT, one flintlock in my hand, and two chest belts each with 13 more flintlocks. AS THE FOUNDING FATHERS INTENDED!
Aye, my favorite of the Founding Fathers - BLACKBEARD!
one for each pocket, and 1-2 strapped on the ankles, and 1 on the thighs, one for the belt,etc.
If one silencer makes the gun quieter, imagine how quiet it must be with twenty-seven!
You'd think that, but it actually wraps around the bottom of the graph and BECOMES EXTRA LOUD!
The guy is 67, so he may have bought those over a long time, possibly for different guns. If he shoots a lot, he might even have burnt out a few.
The photo is of a different person.
The begrudging comes from expecting the odd collection to be exempt from tax.
I don't think that's accurate, but I understand why you say that.
The tax on suppressors (and automatic weapons) is often several hundred percent, because the legislature and regulatory agencies are not allowed (by the supreme court's opinions in the last few decades) to outright BAN them. The very high tax is pretty much the only way they have to restrict the sale of those items.
I've never heard a gun enthusiast say they shouldn't have to pay sales taxes. (Well, that's not true because there's some overlap between gun fanatics and libertarian tax radicals.)
Exempt from punitive taxes. Nobody is saying suppressors shouldn't be taxed like game consoles or dog food, they're saying suppressors shouldn't be taxed like gambling or tobacco
If there's a $200 tax stamp on blue eyes white dragons that needs to go too, but afaik now they're evenly taxed (sales tax alone). Neither are "exempt."
And they're still regulated, you just don't need to pay the $200 that was meant to be cost prohibitive when enacted in 1934, so what are you complaining about? That the poors can now have them easier? They should be entirely deregulated like France tbh.