this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
481 points (97.1% liked)

Progressive Politics

3068 readers
661 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I need 27 suppressors for my 27 guns. Ever thought of that? Didn't think so.

[–] goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

And why do I need 27 guns? That's right, for my 27 hands. Betcha feel real silly now, huh buster?

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 8 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That's RIGHT, one flintlock in my hand, and two chest belts each with 13 more flintlocks. AS THE FOUNDING FATHERS INTENDED!

[–] goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

Aye, my favorite of the Founding Fathers - BLACKBEARD!

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

People do make reproduction flintlocks, and, given that the majority of these are basically custom order...

... you could probably pay for the barrel to be threaded, to allow for it to attach a supressor, or possibly just ask the gunsmith to make a custom, integrally suppressed barrel.

Problem with the threaded barrel is that most flintlocks fire very large caliber rounds, so... finding an actual compatible and attachable suppressor would be difficult.

... it would be a jokey gimmick gun, but you could do it.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

A blunderbuss is not a rifle.

The barrel is not rifled.

They were essentially early or proto-shotguns.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

one for each pocket, and 1-2 strapped on the ankles, and 1 on the thighs, one for the belt,etc.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Which makes sense to do because drawing another flintlock pistol is much, much faster than trying to reload one.

Modern bandoliers have shotgun shells , modern assault rigs carry spare magazines...pirates didn't have firearms with magazines that could take a new mag or stripper clip, so, their bandoliers just held more guns.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Such a dumb "gotcha!" I have loads of guns and only a couple are primarily for self defense.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

For sure, hunting rifles can benefit from suppression as well, and plinking guns too if you're not in an indoor range.

What's more I'd only want a can on my defensive rifles. On the handguns I'll eat the hearing damage before I stick 4"-7" more in the front of my pants, it's crowded as is, and that draw would be crazy lol.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think if you put 27 suppressors in series, the bullet wouldn't even make it out. You'd have to point your 12 foot long handgun down and shake it!

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 5 points 2 weeks ago

I bet it wouldn't even shoot through a strawman.

[–] Longpork3@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 weeks ago

Luckily, someone has already tested this

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5ehmdV80IiE