this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
68 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

4140 readers
151 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (4 children)

As a stupid American I had to read that a few times before it clicked.

A religious leader is homeless but has apartments to rent? Oh, maybe they’re ministering to the homeless - but they raised the rents? . . Ohhhh. Right.

[–] serialdeviant@mstdn.social 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

@homesweethomeMrL @als

Read a bit more into it. Her tenants' rental contract came to an end, and they were given the option of staying on while the house was put on the market. They chose to move out, and the house wasn't sold, and it was put back on the rental market.

It's a four-bed house, and the market rate for a three-bed flat in that area is almost £3500. So £4000 isn't out of sync with the area.

They weren't evicted. The rent is ridiculous because it's London.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/homelessness-minister-under-fire-for-tenant-evictions/ar-AA1K5Tgi

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Even if they weren't technically evicted, she's a minister responsible for homelessness issues, and a landlord owning very expensive housing stock, who saw an opportunity to crank up her rents because circumstances had enabled her to clear our all her tenants. It's still a very bad look.

[–] serialdeviant@mstdn.social 1 points 3 days ago

@floofloof it *is* a very bad look and now she's resigned.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)