UK Politics

4200 readers

189 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

One in five Britons would consider voting for a new left-wing party, rising to one in three young people and Labour voters (www.ipsos.com)

submitted 6 days ago by flamingos@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A new Ipsos in the UK poll reveals that the left-wing political party recently founded by former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and MP Zarah Sultana could capture a significant segment of the British electorate, particularly among younger voters and those who supported the Labour and Green parties in the 2024 General Election.

Overall, 20% of British adults say they would be 'very' or 'fairly likely' to consider voting for a new left-wing party. This figure, however, masks a sharp generational divide. A third (33%) of those aged 16-34 would consider voting for the new party, a figure that drops to 22% among 35-54s and just 9% among those aged 55 and over.

The potential for this new party to disrupt the existing political landscape is most evident in its appeal to voters of other left-leaning parties. One-third (33%) of those who voted Labour in 2024 and 43% of 2024 Green party voters would consider lending their vote to a Corbyn-Sultana-led party.
[…]
An alliance between the [Corbyn/Sultana Party and the Greens] would be a potent force, with 31% of all Britons saying they would consider voting for a united ticket. This rises to a majority (52%) among 16-34s and includes nearly half (46%) of 2024 Labour voters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

LGBT rights shouldn't be up for debate.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Then the membership will make that rule.

Corbyn is not a leader yet. Nor are any MPs party MPs yet hence the whole your party temp name.

No one in the party has any right to an opinion without the membership. Because that is the whole point of the party.

You can dislike it. But you do not get to say it stands for or against anything untill autumn. When it's members choose.

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But you do not get to say it stands for or against anything untill autumn

And yet Corbyn and Sultana have made strong statements about this party's prospective position on things like nationalisation, Gaza, welfare, a wealth tax, housing, and pollution. It's a choice not to include LGBT rights in that, one that reflects badly on them.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 4 points 5 days ago

They have not. They have not even declared themselves leaders.

They have made proposals as the what the party may vote for. But have made it extremely clear that it is a democratic party start to finish.

They are founders who have opinions. And clearly indicate that is all theyare in interviews. They have indicated they would be happy to act as joint leaders if chosen. But again leave it to the party members.

Just like any other member expressing a personal opinion is entirely allowed. But both parties have made it clear I. Interviews they are only their personnel opinion and ideal. Not the parties.