Asklemmy

50132 readers

547 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

130

Are you a feminist? (If so why, if not why not?) (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 1 week ago by dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

303 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Might help also to describe what you think feminism is, since it's one of those terms that is overloaded.

I once had a physical therapist tell me she wasn't a feminist because she thought women couldn't be as physically capable as men when serving as soldiers, and seemed to believe feminism requires treating women exactly like men.

I told her I was a feminist because I believe in equal rights for men and women, an idea she did not seem so opposed to.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

no. it's reasonable to discuss consent from humans, since humans can be informed. if the circumstances preclude them from being informed, that doesn't change whether consent should still be required.

[–] crazyminner@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You just said a bunch of words without answering what makes it wrong to SA a human that can't be informed vs a cow that cant be informed.

The answer is there is none, other than speciesist bs. The answer is they suffer. They suffer just as much as some humans. They have just as much ability to consent as some humans(which is none) yet you consider them the same as you would consider a fucking door.

They are not a door. Again they can suffer and doors CANNOT suffer. They are sentient and have desires like not getting SA or not dying or on and on, where as a door is not sentient and does not have desires.

The whole idea behind consent is to not go against someone's desires (If they do not consent) and to go with someone's desires (if they do consent). Just because cows can't communicate consent doesn't mean they don't have those desires that are at the root of why were even have consent in the first place.

Here are some facts about cows and how smart they are. Please read up on them before comparing them to a door again. https://vegfaqs.com/how-intelligent-is-a-cow/

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

it takes a great deal of intellectual dishonesty to pretend I haven't given a sufficient explanation.