this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
310 points (86.9% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

2221 readers
223 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I could be wrong, but China now surpassed US in terms of R&D spending. That explains a lot.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 week ago

It's embarrassing how much the usa is just dropping everything that got them ahead.

We're spending more on how to get schools to be more like prisons than how to improve people's lives

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And it's being done without regard for maximizing profit

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not even exactly that - r&d basically always has huge returns for decades or even centuries.

It's just investing, not prioritising short-term profits ... and not having a system where the economy collapses if profits fall, not even necessarily into negative territories. They just need/want infrastructure, so they build it to have it (and profit from externalities of having said infrastructure, not building in some sort of direct profitability features). They want clan air, they pass laws & directives.

It's not black or white, but def the shade contrasts with western world.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I don't like the authoritarianism, but I kinda like China's approach to reorient the economy depending on the needs. Too much economic growth at the expense of public investment, and they will reorient towards more public services and vice versa. This sounds similar to Keynesian economics and I am an old school proponent of Keynesianism.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

China is full of engineers, US is full of lawyers.

[–] Evolith@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

And MBAs to give the lawyers work while the "consumer" population foots the bill