Evil_Shrubbery

joined 1 week ago
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 0 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

What were you Boy doing all night? (:

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

(I searched for the least suggestive one, I think it's enough potato to not need a spoiler, hope I'm right.)

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 2 points 12 hours ago

More the angle of approach & hope for normal crosswinds.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 3 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, also not an expert, but you can see the weird acceleration & how suddenly it got lift again.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 4 points 12 hours ago

They just miniaturised it, but kept it secret.

We have high hopes for WT forum to explain more.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 6 points 12 hours ago

Its just an official document repository.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

2016 not-quite Tour de France.

A group of around 20 llamas were pictured sitting on the road, which forms part of the Tour’s course, on 2 July.

The photographer, Joel Sagada, told the Huffington Post that the herd were bought by the owner of a campsite in La Mongie to maintain the ground in the winter.

However, come the summer, the campsite owner was forced to move them into another area and the herd will now stay in Tourmalet until October.

In the images from earlier this month, the llamas were sitting on the road in order to keep warm in the foggy conditions.

independent.co.uk/sport/cycling/tour-de-france-2016-llamas-stage-eight-col-du-tourmalet-a7128461

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 4 points 16 hours ago

This, but not because I'm cool - I just can't take useful notes.

And making shitty notes makes me miss even more shit than I forget.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Probably all of them have it, I would be surprised if you could turn it off actually.

The "refresh" just makes the pic more uniform again, the refresh itself is a sort of controlled burn-in.
Not too long ago OLEDs would lose brightness due to it (especially red brightness iirc?).

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

For a bright room they only now have(ish!) the juice to actually perform*, but they all recommend to run them are like 80% brightness.

*top, expensive models I mean, and even tho for a lot of content you need a little bit less brightness compared to even VA, due to contrast, but that is way not enough to make a difference + with dimness of OLEDs you have to be extra careful to buy one that actually has a black screen when turned off in a bright room (and not grey in a bright environment bcs it fucks the contrast).

So, my use case, with running at 100% brightness, I would have some sort of burn-in in a few years. Absolutely not something I want to look at for a decade.

And I'm old enough to have had beautiful PVA & MVA matrices that burned in (I bought them old actually -I clinged to my CRT for as long as possible, and then suffered TN for gaming- and for my second monitor most of the time).

One of my 1600×1200 PVAs (the later model without burn in) is still next to my serves, so every few years or so it shows console :'''(.

As I see it, for a bright room, there are no OLEDs ... maybe some of the newest gen TVs maybe?
For a normal room, buy an OLED with the mentality that you might want to e-waste it after 5 years of taking care of it (no static content, no max brightness).
(This is way batter than 1 or 2 years from a few gens back.)

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Zypper gang, dup!!
[an hour later]
Done!

(But actually I like it.)

view more: next ›