this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
261 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

42358 readers
537 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/50130760

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Laws don't magically break encryption. I'm not sure what you're trying to say.

They're trying to force Signal to weaken the application, Signal says they won't do it.

They can ban Signal for not complying, but you know how difficult it is to ban a digital application? It might make it more popular since it'll be one of very few actually secure messaging apps out there.

[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I imagined the law would be enforced by a deal with google and some global android state approved keylogger/backdoor completely bypassing all apps including Signal. But yeah, I'm having trouble wrapping my brain around this.

[–] beyond@linkage.ds8.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Recently Google announced they were going to restrict certified Android devices to only allowing apps approved by Google. An F-Droid member found references to "blocked developers" in the new verification code. It's not unreasonable to assume that this developer blocklist could be region-dependent and Google could use this ability to block Signal from being installed in EU.