Enough Musk Spam

3196 readers

61 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

jordanpeterson@lemmy.world

an0nym0us@lemmy.dbzer0.com

131

Musk’s X posts on ketamine, Putin spur release of his security clearances (arstechnica.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by bytesonbike@discuss.online to c/enoughmuskspam@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Elon Musk's social media posts helped The New York Times win its fight to secure a list detailing the billionaire's top-secret security clearances after a US agency tried to block the disclosures by claiming that Musk had a right to privacy.

In an opinion issued Wednesday, US District Judge Denise Cote said that in publicly discussing his security clearances on X—as well as his drug use and foreign contacts—Musk tipped the balance so that the public's substantial interest in the list the NYT sought clearly outweighed "any privacy interest" Musk may have.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Why would we give security clearance to wealthy people?

They can literally move where they please and nothing would affect them. There's no incentive for them to be loyal. Is it our bribe? The public giving their ego a good stroking?

Musk could move 50 fucking times this year and then build his own country and then finance a personal military, but let's give him access to our secrets.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What does any of this have to do with moving?

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

They are not part of the social contract that makes us citizens. They are citizens of the world, not any country. Heck, musk is an illegal immigrant from South Africa. Murdoch is an ex Australian. Their loyalty is to money and power, not any country.