this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
469 points (98.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

13636 readers
411 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I like cars. Love driving. I still think cities should be walkable and have good public transit. In fact I prefer driving outside big cities.

Fuckcars has always been "fuck car dependence" mostly.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why do we need both, then? Cars are always going to come at the detriment of other forms of transportation. Cars have externalities that no other form has; every time you drive a km, you kill a fractional human being. How do you do the math on that and decide you liking cars is more important than the significant fraction of a human being that you kill? It's like alcohol; there's no good amount, but the addicts are going to insist otherwise on the flimsiest of evidence.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Because sometimes I like getting there in one hour instead of 4 by train because my route isn't common enough to build a railroad for, so I'd have to take two trains. This goes for more than one place I sometimes need to get to. Keep in mind, I live in a properly small town currently.

You also kill a fractional human being every time you take the bus or train, the fraction is just significantly smaller. But it's there.

[–] sunflowercowboy@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

You can think cars are problem while acknowledging aspects they are necessary in. Off road on a bike is ludicrously difficult, impossible on trains or busses, and dangerous at times on foot.

Acknowledging it as the problem is a fallacy, acknowledging as a tool is important. You use the right tool for the job, not the most convenient. The issue is that we live in a society that sees vice grips as good enough for the job, and anything as a hammer. Using the right tool is important but laziness is easiest.