this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
235 points (98.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

13601 readers
141 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Non paywalled version

https://archive.md/wZytx

Turns out a car is particularly inefficient.. Who knew /s

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Humans aren’t very efficient movers.

Now that's bullshit. Efficient walking is literally one of the few things we're best at. Chasing prey to exhaustion is a hunting method we are made for.

Edit: right, movers, not walkers.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago

Compared to other things that walk, yes. Muscle efficiency is gutter tier shit in general. Internal combustion engines look good in comparison, and no, I'm not joking.

This is why e-bikes are the most efficient form of travel in terms of calories burned per km. Batteries and electric motors are about as efficient as anything can be, and it's better when they're not pushing around a large metal box.

In terms of lifetime CO2 output, though, they never quite catch up to regular bikes due to the extra manufacturing needs. It's not a huge difference, though; if an e-bike is what gets people out of a car, that's a massive win.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah, according to that graph a human (on foot) is beaten only by salmon, horse, jet transport, and... humans b/w pedal power.

We're never gonna beat salmon, they're pretty much the ideal swimmers. We're also never gonna beat horses, they're superb.

I guess all that's left is jetpacks /j

[–] visnae@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I mean, depends on how you compare it. A salmon on land is pretty inefficient. 😂

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Uhm, horse? Moving 4 legs with hoofs vs. 2 in pendulum and with heels.