this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2025
625 points (99.2% liked)

politics

26189 readers
2660 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago (5 children)

And the military who thinks they're being ordered to break the law should stay and resist...

Like, I know, this a marine. But surely they retain enough critical thinking to understand if everyone who thinks trump is giving illegal orders resigns...

The only people left in the military would be people who are fine with this shit.

When people say "lead, follow, or get out of the way"

The "get out of the way" option is supposed to embarrass them into at least following.

You can't "get out of the way" of fucking fascism and then expect people to clap for you. It's only going to be idiots who don't understand anything clapping.

Giving up is not a viable strategy in the face of fascism.

[–] dvoraqs@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Resigning is a way to call attention to the problem while you still have most of your credibility. There would be a smear campaign against you, but the alternative situation might be after getting fired for cause, where it would be easier to believe that you are just making excuses to save face. Especially if you are already demoralized and don't have the energy to make a stand, you may start feeding the idea that you are just unfit for the job and lose support internally.

It also adds a bit of chaos into the organization that needs to replace you and may not have somebody prepared to step into a position haunted by this politicized issue and rocky transition. It does happen because organizations are made of limited and discrete people, but it is easy to be afraid of the infinite number of sycophants that must be ready to take their place.

It might be a tactic that is useful in limited situations, but I agree in general that we want rusty cogs slowing down the fascist machine.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As I understand it, they were about to fire him, so staying and resisting may not have been an option. Perhaps he wanted to get ahead of the story and have his.moment to speak.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Also, I've never been in the military, but I imagine they have extremely strict policies against active duty members (particularly officers) criticizing the administration in public. This guy probably had to quit first if he wanted to say what he said publicly.

I hope it has an effect on current active-duty troops when they get their illegal orders.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

they were about to fire him

Then make them do it...

It's not something that can happen at the snap of a finger, and even after the fact would involve court cases that take resources away from the shitty things they're trying to do...

We're fucking fighting fascism man, we have to fight every battle even if we lose, because it at least eats up the clock.

There is literally zero gain from resigning.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If all the decent, moral, knowledgeable, experienced military personnel leave, then MAGA will be left with a military of incompetents, led by incompetents, all the way to the very top. They may have the weapons, but they won't know how to use them.

But the Resistance will have all the intelligent experienced military leaders, who not only know how to use the weapons, but know how they are secured, and how they can be "liberated."

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

but they won’t know how to use them.

...

I can assure you even a child can use a rifle. Sadly it happens every day.

And that "resistance" is not going to have access to any type of weapon that would require more than five minutes of training.

I was military, my dad was military, a grand dad was, multiple aunts/uncles were, literally innumerable cousins...

I can assure you not all of my family is intelligent, and the military designs things for the lowest common denominator.

Even nuclear engineering in the military isn't exactly challenging, the training is just intentionally stressful so it will be harder than actual service.

Like, look at other actual resistances in other countries, you don't even know what will be used as weapons in a hypothetical resistance...

And this place is better than reddit, but I don't think I could get more specific than that

Edit:

Also, intelligence and compassion aren't correlated.

In fact once you get more than a couple standard deviations above average, misanthropy tends to be one the norm.

It's hard to explain. Imagine someone just walks up and hits you in the balls, then acts surprised that you're hurt and upset with them

Long before a very intelligent person understands that they're very intelligent...

They just think every other human is an inconsiderate asshole we doesn't put a second of thought into how their actions effects others. It is incredible easy and unfortunately common for that opinion to stuck around for a long time.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, everyone knows if the majority of the military is untrained and lacks critical thinking skills, they could never successfully oppress their population.

That's why African Warlords with armies full of child soldiers famously never commit unspeakable atrocities on their citizens.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a silly analogy. American soldiers do not have the same life experiences as African child soldiers. It's ridiculous to think that both types of soldiers would react the same way.

All soldiers have the potential to commit atrocities, and many will, but a lot of American soldiers will refuse to commit atrocities against their fellow citizens.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

a lot of American soldiers will refuse to commit atrocities against their fellow citizens

Tell that to Kent State.

American soldiers are soldiers. Soldiers follow orders. Soldiers without critical thinking skills follow orders without question.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

Which is one of the reasons that any will hesitate to fire on Americans. The reputation of the National Guard was very badly damaged by the aftermath of Kent State, and it took decades before any trust returned.

It's been a long time since that happened, and hopefully there are still a few in leadership that remember that an instant of satisfaction from pulling the trigger will lead to decades of repercussions.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Agreed. I get the guys point, but the most powerful weapon we still have is our soldiers, and their allegiance to the American people, and the principals that our country stands for. He is far more powerful if he remains, and sticks to his beliefs.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 6 points 1 week ago

That assumes he can stay and won't be dishonorable discharged for some trumped up reason.

This gives him a platform to let others know that shit is going down without that smear campaign.