this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
        
      834 points (96.6% liked)
      Political Memes
    9740 readers
  
      
      1345 users here now
      Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
        founded 2 years ago
      
      MODERATORS
      
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
    view the rest of the comments
 
          
          
To build trust.
Russia is also the prize. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grand_Chessboard
Suggesting that they wouldn't dismantle their power to the point that they get a regime change for independent politics like nationalizing the oil industry.
This is a common bullshit stance Russia apologists love to take.
Why is the burden of building trust on NATO when Russia had just gotten done occupying and oppressing half of Europe?
You understand nearly every single European country under the Iron Curtain wanted to diplomatically run to the West because of how fucking awful Russia was to them, right?
Ok rather than just slapping a reference and link to an entire article, why don't you articulate the point you're trying to get across than making me read through that entire thing to find your point?
If you're claiming Russia's atrocities against Ukraine, Georgia, Chechnya, Syria, (and everywhere they've sent the Nazi mercs Wagner is all to keep power, you're insane.
There is no obligation for it. It would just have been the complementary option to including Russia into Nato. The chosen third option has led to where we are now.
The US have an interest in keeping Russia small. Some actions can also be explained by Russia trying to limit external influence.
Maybe I am insane but I didn't make that claim. Maintaining some level of power that is too much for Nato membership doesn't imply offensive actions. Furthermore these involvements came after the window for Nato membership.