this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
289 points (99.3% liked)

politics

26166 readers
2704 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Government workers, especially ATC, should just walk out on their jobs now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Parliamentary system seems superior in every single way to what we have here.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Didn't Belgium go for almost 3 years without a government a while back? Meanwhile France is on their 5th prime minister in 2 years. I think the issue is that Democracy is entirely incompatible with capitalism.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago

I never said it was perfect, but it is better if only for the fact that it allows for more than two parties.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I really dislike voting for parties rather than individuals. I realize parties are inevitable, but I hate them. I want to elect an individual who I trust to fight hard for the things I want and to have the wisdom to make compromises—even painful ones—to achieve a greater good.

Like with Obama, I trust that he had to make some difficult choices and did the best he could, even when I vehemently disagreed with some of them. Literally the only President in my lifetime I feel that way about, and the party would never have made him President. Or PM, I suppose it would be.

I'm not saying the benefits of parliamentary systems wouldn't outweigh the harms, but they definitely aren't perfect.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At least parliamentary system allows for more than two parties.

Also, people do directly vote for their MPs in most systems.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought they elected a party and the party chooses who leads it? Have to be honest I don't follow foreign politics as well as I should. But the same thing applies at a local level. I want to vote for individual representatives and senators. At whatever level I don't want a bunch of out of touch rich folks deciding who best represents my individual interests.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You should refresh your memory on what a parliamentary system actually is...

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You're right. I had some fundamental misunderstandings of the system. My apologies. I'll go rethink things. Thank you for bringing that to my attention.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

No worries... No system is perfect, but I personally think there are a lot of benefits to it over what we currently have in the US.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Even though most countries (that I know of) have a similar personality cult, the head guy has never as much power as POTUS.