this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
593 points (98.7% liked)

politics

26135 readers
3378 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jeff Merkley of Oregon gave address to make case that president is ‘violating the law’ through authoritarianism

Oregon’s Jeff Merkley gave a marathon, nearly 23-hour speech on the Senate floor that began on Tuesday and ended late Wednesday, pressing the case that Donald Trump is acting as an authoritarian by prosecuting political enemies and deploying the military into Merkley’s home town of Portland.

The 68-year-old senator began speaking around 6.20pm on Tuesday evening and continued until just after 5pm on Wednesday. Standing continuously on the Senate floor alongside placards that read “authoritarianism is here now!” and “Trump is violating the law”, Merkley paused only to take questions from fellow Democratic senators who joined him in the chamber to make their own points about the president’s conduct.

“I’ve come to the Senate floor tonight to ring the alarm bells. We’re in the most perilous moment, the biggest threat to our republic since the civil war. President Trump is shredding our constitution,” Merkley said as he began his speech.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Without even knowing what he spoke about yet, which I don't, I can respect the conviction of a person who uses their platform to speak when they have rare access to that platform and there's plenty to talk about.

Plenty of us are going on marathon posting sessions on social media and it's to a much smaller audience. I have to empathize a little bit with anybody who feels exhausted or overwhelmed by the absurdity of everything but then gets up to speak for a whole damn day on one of the largest stages in the world

Even if the room is empty the audience is global. It may be grandstanding, but that's part of the job. Getting attention to things you care about is part of the job. People put you there to bring attention to things that they hope that you care about.

If government's going to work at all people have to give a shit about it and whatever this dude was talking about it's clear he gives a shit about it.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Plenty of us are going on marathon posting sessions on social media

I didn't think of that either...

People acknowledgeing how little this did, have to acknowledge they're also not really "fighting the power" themselves.

Good point.

[–] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Some will show up and do things only because they feel the support is out there to act and be seen.

I might make different efforts were I them, but they are at least paddling in the same direction I want to go. I just don't have the energy to resent how they choose to spend their outrage.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think a better analogy is that they are paddling in the direction that we all want to go but are denying that the ship they are paddling is sinking. We need them to be directing people to life boats and fighting back against the fascist boarding our ship. But they seem to just want to paddle forward when the water is already above their chest. There is no honor in "going down with the ship" if all you did that whole time was useless. Captains "go down with the ship" to make sure they did everything in their power to save people. That is not what the Democrats are doing at all.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

If your house is burning down, your kids and dog are trapped inside...

You barely make it out alive, but you know your family is in there...

Firefighters show up, a wave of relief washes over....

Then they sit down and pray to Jesus that someone comes to put out the fire.

If you got upset the people paid to put out fires aren't using the equipment or putting any real effort into saving your family who are actively burning to death, and you yell at the firefighters:

Why won't you fucking do anything?

How would you react to someone telling you the firefighters are doing all they can?

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Dude. We're not elected policians. You really need to have a higher standard for your representatives than people posting on Twitter.

It really was not a good point AT ALL. I swear liberals are so use to not expecting any material change from their party that all they do is hold them to the same standard as a social media poster. That's actually pathetic.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

You really need to have a higher standard for your representatives than people posting on Twitter.

I am...

I'm saying if those people admit the politicians aren't doing anything productive, then it obviously means funny signs won't do anything, even if you have a frog costume....