this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
428 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

63614 readers
3040 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

25 States Agree To Quadruple Number Of Heat Pumps In America::The US Climate Alliance met in New York City this week to explain the benefits of heat pumps, including better health for American families.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Direct electric heat is very efficient. Practically 100%.

My understanding is that you would only need the aux source during extreme cold. So very rarely.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My heat pump is around 300% efficient. It adds 3X the energy into the house than it spends by stealing that energy from outside.

[–] Toine@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except when it's very cold outside, which is what was discussed here. Heat pumps are great (have one in my home), but it might not be ideal in very cold areas, especially if electricity prices are high compared to other energy sources.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You need to be in a very, VERY cold area for that to matter. While these places exists, I'm sure it's not the case for a lot of the states I've seen marked in that article. Heat pump can heat the inside of your house even when it's freezing outside.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

...and it will never go below 100% because most have resistive heating as backup.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's a misleading number. In most other cases where we are using electricity--motors, CPUs, lighting, etc--we consider the heat generated to be inefficiency. It might be more accurate to say that electric resistance heating is 100% inefficient.

If you're using resistance heating to heat your home, using electricity that's originally produced by natural gas, then you're using more natural gas compared to burning that gas for heat directly in a home furnace. Now, electric resistance heating can be a choice when it's fed by clean electrical sources otherwise. Even then, though, you would prefer a heat pump if possible.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

And a heat pump powered by a natural gas power plant will bring more heat into the house for the same amount of gas, including losses in transmission. It will likely be more expensive to install and run, though.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

It might be more accurate to say that electric resistance heating is 100% inefficient.

But the heat is the goal.

[–] myusernameblows@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you consider "extreme" cold?

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

I don't know. It's a curve though, not a cutoff.

Icing conditions can also be a factor; freezing rain in the high 20's F (~-4C for those who can't F) will build up a layer of ice on the outside unit especially since it's already the coldest thing around. That ice prevents air from circulating through, so it loses effectiveness. Running the strips for about a half hour or so, then running the air conditioner for about a half hour will defrost it quite effectively and restore it to efficient operation. It is my understanding some systems even do this automatically.