this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
221 points (95.9% liked)

Mildly Interesting

20140 readers
1249 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Ok, I'll bite. Why is banning only menthols racist?

[–] bundtpan@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Because African American smokers tend to favor menthol over other types of cigarettes.

“In the 1950s, less than 10% of Black smokers used menthol cigarettes. Today, after decades of tobacco industry targeting, that number is 85%. Menthol cigarettes continue to be heavily advertised, widely available and priced cheaper in Black communities."

https://www.tobaccofreekids.org/what-we-do/industry-watch/menthol-report

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Because it’s doing the most harm to the most harmed demographic?

[–] Beardsley@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Black people tend to primarily smoke menthol, disproportionate to other races. I'm too lazy to link, but you can Google it and find studies pretty easily.

[–] Melkath@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago

It's why this same prohibition measure has failed in many legislative bodies many times.