this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
456 points (99.8% liked)

196

17027 readers
886 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org
qaz@lemmy.world
qaz@sh.itjust.works
456
T(rule)kies (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 2 years ago by lobster_teapot@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] HelixDab@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's closer to anarchism then communism. Communism, as it's generally developed, has a central state authority.

Personally, I see the existence of a state and individual liberties as always under tension. You can't have a state without some infringement on individual expressions. But some restriction on individual expression is necessary for a functioning society. The question is what infringements and under what circumstances are acceptable.