this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
818 points (100.0% liked)

196

17043 readers
1090 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkenLM@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It does resemble socialism, but there are differences depending on the school of thought of Anarchism that you prefer It is not completely incompatible with individual property.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you have property rights without hierarchy and without a state?

[–] Fox@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By having the means to defend them

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Private Property is hierarchy. You cannot have an employee/Owner relationship without unjust hierarchy. Personal Property is allowable within Socialism, as such Anarchism is only Socialistic, unless you change the very meaning of Anarchism.

Being able to kill anyone that opposes your ownership of Capital also implies a monopoly on violence, and thus a form of State.

There's no such thing as Anarcho-Capitalism, just Libertarian Capitalist LARPing with Anarchist aesthetics.