this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
379 points (100.0% liked)

196

17019 readers
677 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yes, I did actually get a BSOD from that, no it wasn’t my PC

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Early 90s, NT 3.1 was released in 93. By release date, nearly 31 years old. First version that a significant number of people actually used was 4.0, 96, and the first consumers used was 2000. Development started in 89, as OS/2 3.0, then still a joint project with IBM.

For comparison, the first public Linux version dates to 91, 1.0 to 94, though Unix of course goes back to 69. Practically the only other thing still surviving from that era are IBM mainframes. In CS terms both are prehistorical, you can tell by how papers from back then aren't typeset in TeX, worse, are usually scans. Yet they somehow had it all pretty much already figured out and we're now often re-discovering insights that they simply didn't have the hardware to implement back then. Not impossible to implement back then but here's a fun one. And a modern walk-through through the thing.

[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've always had a thing for older, more mature kernels.

KILF Kernels I would like to fuck