this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
152 points (99.4% liked)

Crazy Fucking Videos

6113 readers
4 users here now

Dive into the World of Insane Videos!

Rules

  1. No hate speech of any kind.
  2. Content warnings are required in post titles where applicable. Example: [CW: Injury]
  3. Use your best judgement and mark NSFW posts as such.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 46 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

"The crash caused significant damage to the aircraft". Um, what aircraft? You mean that hole in the ground?

Glad the pilot's OK.

[–] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Isn't the failure rate on the F 35 like WAY higher than previous fighters? Oh well, at least Lockheed got that sweet, sweet contract, right?

[–] FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee 32 points 3 weeks ago

Arguably F-35 have more failure points. I say this as an ex F-18 mechanic so you probably can't take me at my word

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

It has extremely low flight time. There is also "Right to repair" issues in favour of manufacturer where they don't provide adequate manuals to keep the aircraft operational. Decline of US is affected by military mission to spend more money to political donors rather than provide value to Armed Forces.

[–] noride@lemm.ee 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

Google says that thing cost somewhere between $82MM - $109MM. I wonder how many meals it could have been instead.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

As of July 2024, the average flyaway costs per plane are: US$82.5 million for the F-35A, $109 million for the F-35B, and $102.1 million for the F-35C.

Wikipedia.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Thats a lot of millimeter dollars.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

My country benefits from military surplus aides from the U. S. I wouldn't mind if America takes care of it's children first.

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

The R&D on that jet would have solved world hunger and provided free healthcare for the whole US. Instead, we kill our pilots with them. Excellent use of funds.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 3 weeks ago

That doesn't look like a normal landing. They should have strapped a cat to it to stabilize the axis.

[–] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's gonna be a lot of paperwork

[–] DarkShaggy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

And meetings to discuss / review the paperwork...

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Isn't that the second F35 in a few weeks? I can remember another F35 having a nose gear failure with the pilot ejecting at ground level.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I can't find anything in the last few weeks, there was one nearly a year ago. No ejection though.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

You're right, I saw an older video and took it as new: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9GBHNaYzcs

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Shit'll buff out

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Am I missing something? I’m not seeing a video in the post or at the link

[–] Wilshire@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

It’s a feature of the software. Nothing to see here.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Whilst in technically true that the plane was landing, I don't think he was actually making a landing.

Looked a lot more like the plane wasn't under power at all.

[–] eRac@lemmings.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Landing gear were down, so it was likely coming in for a landing when the incident occurred. Based on the height and positioning, maybe an attempted go-around that ended in abandoning the craft entirely.