Not exactly a good comparison since the trial of Jesus is not well documented. There are many rumors and second-hand accounts but no original documents.
this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
22 points (92.3% liked)
History
863 readers
13 users here now
Welcome to c/History @ Mander.xyz!
Notice Board
- 2023-07-01: We are looking for mods. Send a dm to @fossilesque@mander.xyz if interested! This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.
Work in progress...
Rules
- Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
- Keep it rooted (on topic).
- No spam.
Similar Communities
- !openscience@lemmy.ml
- !historymemes@lemmy.ml
- !history@lemmy.world
- !history@lemmygrad.ml
- !fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world
Sister Communities
Science and Research
Biology and Life Sciences
- !anthropology@mander.xyz
- !microbiology@mander.xyz
- !biodiversity@mander.xyz
- !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
- !palaeontology@mander.xyz
Plants & Gardening
Physical Sciences
Humanities and Social Sciences
- !archaeology@mander.xyz
- !cooking@mander.xyz
- !folklore@mander.xyz
- !history@mander.xyz
- !old_maps@mander.xyz
Memes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
22
1,900-year-old papyrus 'best-documented Roman court case from Judaea apart from the trial of Jesus'
(www.livescience.com)
some people can get rattled by this, but there most likely never was a historical jesus figure; there may have been, but it's wildly unlikely, for soo many reasons - and there's nowhere near enough evidence to say the character definitely existed, not even close.
There's nowhere enough evidence to say he definitely existed but the scholarly consensus is that he most likely did.
The ladder half of that headline made the former pretty worthless.
Yeah the trial of a Folk Tale doesn’t have that much weight in reality-…
So the document had been classified as written in Nabataean, but it's unclear if that turned out not to be the case in the end?