this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
41 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

16513 readers
209 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Great statistical work. It's a small sample size but the data is pretty neat.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

CNC kitchen also tested this. https://www.cnckitchen.com/blog/brick-layers-make-3d-prints-stronger

You won't find this built into any slicer because some assholes patented it and are defending the patent.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

They troll patented it. It was already patented, the patent expired, then these dildos patented it again as an "improved technique" and in their application they pointed to a bunch of patents that have nothing to do with the brick layer method.

[–] fayoh@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

TLDW;? Will watch it after work, but I'm curious now. 😁

[–] Marvelicious@fedia.io 12 points 2 weeks ago

Not as drastic as I had hoped, but it looks like around 5% better layer adhesion provided you increase the flow rate slightly to fit in the gaps. It essentially makes a print that's more solid in the walls.

I saw elsewhere someone doing prints with transparent filament and they were also getting optically better prints with this.

Also, there's a pull request on Orca... Not sure when it'll come out, but they're working on building it into the slicer.

[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago

TL;DW: Small sample size aside, it looks like the brick layers could be marginally stronger in some ways, but it can be weaker if you don't also increase the extrusion multiplier since offsetting a column of circles down by half a row in a grid of touching circles will make the circles not touch (hopefully that's an intuitive explanation of the need to increase the extrusion multiplier).

[–] maxwellfire@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

It looks like this was testing in tension? I image most of the improvements would happen in shear. Since that's where you make the crack more tortuous. In tension the increase in contact is very slight.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

he mentions only vertical offset but I don't see why it could not be done horizontal if the lines are stop/started at regular intervals. Im guessing it would not be stronger though than a continuous line.

[–] Marvelicious@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It could, but I don't think there would be any benefit. The key thing this does is make walls a bit closer to the theoretical perfect solid structure.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

ok yeah when he talked about it sorta fitting in between the cracks. so yeah it is closer to more solid. Thanks that actually wraps my head around why better.