j4k3

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 1 points 53 minutes ago

No hate friend. The USB-C version of headphones is just a better hardware design. The 3.5mm connector mixed with modern headphone wire is just a bad mix. Those two have polar opposite soldering constraints. I didn't want to switch either. I have taken apart and repaired both.

Also after taking apart several old phones, the 3.5mm jack is a major moisture ingress point.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

They are a real person. You should not say stuff like this.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

It really does matter. It means that a version of the technology exists without the obfuscation and it is likely scary powerful.

Just with the small models I play with offline, some of the uncensored ones are much more powerful.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Social stigma (dogma) is the primary cause of harm

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Open AI alignment intentionally obfuscates any potentially copyrighted works. People get so confused between what is agentic citations in search results, and what is actual model dialog.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

dam da bears! beaver pita!

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

So by using a transformer, I think you are essentially lowering the voltage to exchange for current. What I do not understand, assuming that simple assumed relationship is correct, is why it is still at thing people do. Like if we lived in the old days of vacuum tubes or bipolar junction transistors, sure it makes sense that a little more current might help. Now, in the era of rail to rail op amps with JFET inputs, I don't understand why anyone needs to create the Eddy current losses of a transformer. Maybe it is safety from transients? But then why attenuate... and why not resistively for a more simple RLC element... very curious now...

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (6 children)

What are the compact options short of a small wire and palm tree? I could probably etch that length on a couple of a4 size sheets of copper clad from ABC at around my minimum resolvable pitch size.

I've never really wrapped my head around impedance in this kind of context to the point of a functional fundamental understanding. I know the basic explanations and definitions well. It is like AC resistance; high impedance means low current potential, aka needs buffering or gain; low impedance is deadly microwave transformers and welding type stuff. I have wound my own I/E core transformers and built a dozen switching supplies, but I do not understand what you mean here by using impedance matching with a transformer. I would like to.

 

I've been watching the Solder Smoke direct conversion receiver challenge build and thinking of maybe building it from parts I already have laying around... assuming I wind my own toroids. I haven't noticed anyone talking about antenna stuff. What is the deal here?

This is the principal video series primer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLjxU2rMeXw

It is also on hackaday too.

Is there some rule about antenna where a more specialized element is required at specific frequencies? I know I'm missing fundamental practical information here as the wave length for 7 MHz is around 43 meters. Even a quarter wave length would involve a house spanning wire. So what gives, what high school fundamental have I forgotten?

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nothing stupider!
Come to Jupiter!
The galaxy knows,
everyone goes,
for the best fillet'n,
from the Galileans!

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

OP is not dev, @DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone is the person to ask

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

explain please

 

IMO we have had decades of iterative change and exploration, but no major shifts or innovations. Like there have been many takes on the sounds of a guitar, but when do we get to the age of distortion piano-ish thing but entirely different? It seems like most major cultural shifts come from the cauldron or crucible of hard times. We may be near such a nightmare, so what do our kids create from the ashes?

 

I figured one of y'all would just know seeing how ubiquitous the 6502 is. I'm not following any tutorial at the moment and it has been too long since I last mucked around in assembly. I have the programming manual but it is convoluted between the 6502 and 65C816 stuff.

I'm messing with the little Easy 6502 emulator (Flatpak/FlatHub). I want to nest a couple of loops. I should probably just use the stack, but I went down this rabbit hole and damn it I want to find the rabbit!

I want something like (crude):

define lineL $1000
define lineH $1001

LDA $00
STA $lineL
LDA $02
STA $lineH

Hopefully I have that endian right... So now I have a 2 byte word starting at address 0×1000 and loaded with 0x0200. I want to increment this value as a 16 bit variable up to 0x05FF. What I am struggling with is which addressing mode indexes like this or if this must be manually implemented (– which does not seem right to me).

I'll figure it out on my own in the next couple of hours regardless. It is more fun to chat and see the spectrum of knowledge here, or maybe not, either way, ya don't know if ya don't try. Skool me Woz

 

Other than yourself. obviously.

I'm curious about the cliché or obscure superlatives with no constraints other than the scope of impact; could be positive or negative in some contexts.

 

I'm looking into them. I know they advertised as being an open source competitor to the Broadcom chips in the Raspberry π. The Rπ only has a partial peripherals datasheet available.

As far as I know, no current hardware has documented tape outs or fab level process documentation. So do any of you know the level of total documentation for the RockChip stuff? Any comments on hardware? Any recommendations on dev boards, tablets, netbooks, bootloader or kernel stuff?

 

I mean working somewhere like Qualcomm or Microsoft when you care about FOSS, democracy, and the public commons, or a weapons manufacturer for a military that invades other countries and kills innocent people in their homes.

 

Also, is self empathy even a thing? Is self empathy distinct from self pity?

 

A master wood machinist, if ever there was such a thing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyTE0OaB4oM

I made a Crytex such as the one from Da Vinci Code, out of wood. This time I used aluminum as well as a metal lathe to produce parts that would have otherwise been too fragile for a customer.
Ebenisterieeloise.com

One of my favorite rare-to-upload stuff - channels. She likes a type of classical music that resonates with me, and I like the way she composes the content, music, and voiceover, combined with clever approaches to problem solving and projects.

 

An hour spent commuting is 1/16th of your daily life, and that hour is by far the biggest risk to your life every day. You should be getting triple pay to ameliorate the hazard risk it represents.

 

As in theme park and water park, opposed to national park and public park.

It seems like a bottleneck in language that I am struggling to find a way around. I believe the word park is poisoned in embedding models and would like to test that theory but I'm at a loss. I tried my usual thesaurus, looking at translations, and at etymologies but it seems like the word has no effective alternate so far. It is a rather interesting conundrum beyond the scope of my application – how would you differentiate and specify what a place like Disneyland is, without ambiguity, when "park" is not a useful word? And no land is not specific enough to describe the place.

I have a few ideas and stuff I have tried but I really want to know your ideas.

Etymology according to Wiktionary:
From Middle English park, from Old French parc (“livestock pen”), from Medieval Latin parcus, parricus, from Frankish *parrik (“enclosure, pen, fence”). Cognate with Dutch perk (“enclosure; flowerbed”), Old High German pfarrih, pferrih (“enclosure, pen”), Old English pearroc (“enclosure”) (whence modern English paddock), Old Norse parrak, parak (“enclosure, pen; distress, anxiety”), Icelandic parraka (“to keep pent in under restraint and coercion”). More at parrock, paddock. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/park

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gzpY4Wv81U

I didn't know my history in regards to Sappho. It is worth a watch. Jessica is quite the character.

view more: next ›