mmm salty
They are a real person. You should not say stuff like this.
It really does matter. It means that a version of the technology exists without the obfuscation and it is likely scary powerful.
Just with the small models I play with offline, some of the uncensored ones are much more powerful.
Social stigma (dogma) is the primary cause of harm
Open AI alignment intentionally obfuscates any potentially copyrighted works. People get so confused between what is agentic citations in search results, and what is actual model dialog.
dam da bears! beaver pita!
So by using a transformer, I think you are essentially lowering the voltage to exchange for current. What I do not understand, assuming that simple assumed relationship is correct, is why it is still at thing people do. Like if we lived in the old days of vacuum tubes or bipolar junction transistors, sure it makes sense that a little more current might help. Now, in the era of rail to rail op amps with JFET inputs, I don't understand why anyone needs to create the Eddy current losses of a transformer. Maybe it is safety from transients? But then why attenuate... and why not resistively for a more simple RLC element... very curious now...
What are the compact options short of a small wire and palm tree? I could probably etch that length on a couple of a4 size sheets of copper clad from ABC at around my minimum resolvable pitch size.
I've never really wrapped my head around impedance in this kind of context to the point of a functional fundamental understanding. I know the basic explanations and definitions well. It is like AC resistance; high impedance means low current potential, aka needs buffering or gain; low impedance is deadly microwave transformers and welding type stuff. I have wound my own I/E core transformers and built a dozen switching supplies, but I do not understand what you mean here by using impedance matching with a transformer. I would like to.
Nothing stupider!
Come to Jupiter!
The galaxy knows,
everyone goes,
for the best fillet'n,
from the Galileans!
OP is not dev, @DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone is the person to ask
explain please
No hate friend. The USB-C version of headphones is just a better hardware design. The 3.5mm connector mixed with modern headphone wire is just a bad mix. Those two have polar opposite soldering constraints. I didn't want to switch either. I have taken apart and repaired both.
Also after taking apart several old phones, the 3.5mm jack is a major moisture ingress point.