this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
158 points (92.9% liked)

World News

47764 readers
2605 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 144 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Am I being cynical if I wonder if Ticketmaster just cancelled a number of tickets randomly, just so they can resell those at its new "market price." Normally I would just assume incompetence or a mistake, but this is Ticketmaster.

[–] MummifiedClient5000 26 points 4 months ago

Well, you are, but not as cynical as ticketmaster who might have done exactly that.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

If there’s a financial incentive for them to do it, then that’s why they did it. Follow the money. There are no ramifications for Ticketmaster to do this sort of abhorrent behavior. They just don’t care.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 4 months ago

This is almost certainly the case. I also know Airbnb hosts do that all the time.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

You are, and you’re probably right.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Maybe you are, but it's what I thought too.

[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 93 points 4 months ago (3 children)

She initially thought the email was fake, but after realising it was from Ticketmaster she said she does not intend to buy tickets from the company in the future, despite being a loyal customer.

Loyal customer pretty much means the same as regular concert goer.

I go to quite a few concerts and all of my tickets are bought from Ticketmaster in some form. I wouldn’t call myself loyal to them as I’m forced to choose between Ticketmaster or no concert.

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 4 months ago

I have a season MLS ticket to my local team directly through the team, and everything is controlled and processed through Ticketmaster anyways. Have to log in to ticket Master through a special portal to access anything

[–] ShortFuse@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. Is it really loyalty when you only have one option?

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

It sounds better than monopoly. Image is everything.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

100% right and I don't doubt the woman from the article feels the same but if you want to add weight to informing a company they fucking suck you use terms like loyal or committed or something similar that adds the red flag to corporate that their actions are affecting their customer retention bottom line.

Edit: I feel I need to add, "in most cases." Kinda hard for this to affect companies who are aloud to have monopolies over an industry because it throws customer retention concerns out the window. But I stand by my comment because I still think the verbiage used in the email is just the standard way of addressing corporate ran entities.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 82 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How can be legal? Bot detection should apply almost immediately, not after six months.

It smells like "we sold too many tickets, we need a plausible excuse to refund people"

And there's a simple trick to stop bots: make tickets non transferable. But that would hurt their secondary sales on that other reselling site operated by themselves, and shows wouldn't be sold out immediately due to FOMO (if tickets can be resold even at a higher price, people would buy them even if they're not 100% sure they can attend the show)

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

make tickets non transferable

This sounds sensible, but in practice ID checking however many tens of thousands of people on their way into a venue would take forever. (Not to mention now having to deal with the portion of genuine customers who've forgotten to bring Id etc)

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

It should say "bots not approved and distributed by Ticketmaster to scalpers".

[–] glitchead@programming.dev 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Former touring musician here. The larger acts are contractually bound to whatever their label decides on venues and ticketing in most cases. But there's no reason to roll over and accept these assholes at Ticketmaster as our defacto option to have live music. Support local artists and local venues if possible. I'm out in the fucking sticks, but I will drive an hour to catch a show from time to time.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Some venues can also only be booked if you use Ticketmaster. So like at. A certain scale it's impossible for even the labels to avoid it if they wanted.

[–] glitchead@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago

Good point. I'm an eternal optimist for an artist first movement where parasitic corps fuck right off. One day... one day...