this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
90 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

10342 readers
609 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When the dummy was dressed in the reflective jacket, the CR-V didn’t slow in any of the trials, regardless of additional roadway lighting.

You can't win. Wear all black to be "seen" by cars, or high-visibility to be seen by drivers and ignored by cars. 🤞

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yep the pedestrian is the problem in this scenario. 😐 FWIW I bike in high-vis gear, I've died like 13 times. We bend over backwards to prove what the problem is: motor vehicles. Fuck cars.

[–] kubica@fedia.io 17 points 3 days ago

So either get run over by one type of car or by the other, perfect.

[–] romamix@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago

I'm glad IIHS did that: pushing higher standards is always great, so some time in the near future we may see these tests as a part of a standard suite. The test on 3 cars is just a proof of concept: we see 2 of them failing miserably, but it doesn't mean even most of them do, deeper analysis is needed, with more makes and models involved. And it's an important test even if we remove cars from the cities: even in public transportation utopia we will still have unlit out-of-town highways, and it's a good thing to have pedestrians and bikers safe there. Even with separated paths, we will still have crosswalks.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Carry a rifle. That'll get you noticed. And if it doesn't, a couple of well-aimed shots sure as shit will.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Problem solving:

Problem solving in America: Guns

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I know. But when your life is in danger, municipalities cater to vehicles, and drivers don’t care whether you live or die, your options are limited.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Problem solving in Canada: Bricks

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

LOL. I saw a video of a guy (don't know where) who has an "armed cyclist" shirt with a shit ton of lights and reflective stickers all over his bike. I'm sure nobody close passes him now!