this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
2604 points (99.7% liked)

Fediverse

30573 readers
397 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's brief, around 25:15

https://youtube.com/watch?v=nf7XHR3EVHo


If you've been sitting on making a post about your favorite instance, this could be a good opportunity to do so.

Going by our registration applications, a lot of people are learning about the fediverse for the first time and they're excited about the idea. I've really enjoyed reading through them :)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 284 points 6 days ago (19 children)

I wish he had mentioned Lemmy, but it's understandable that he didn't. Also Bluesky isn't an alternative to big tech, it IS big tech. I wish it wasn't stealing so much of our publicity lately.

But beggars can't be choosers, and we have seen some nice growth over the past couple months. John Oliver fans are the perfect candidates to join the fediverse, hopefully some of them find their way to Lemmy.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 78 points 6 days ago (13 children)

I'm really not happy about bluesky their fragmentation of the fediverse protocols is only going to harm us in the long run.

[–] knova@infosec.pub 33 points 6 days ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 39 points 6 days ago (5 children)

John Oliver fans are the perfect candidates to join the fediverse, hopefully some of them find their way to Lemmy.

Too late - we are already here!:-P

img

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] anachronology@fedia.io 45 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Agreed, but at least Bluesky is a public benefit corporation, so it supposed to take in the needs of society as well as profit in its decision-making. That may not be much, but it's a start.

[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 39 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

I'm not familiar with the details of that, but it seems like more of a red herring to me. A form of controlled opposition to divert people away from truly revolutionary platforms.

Of course it has to seem like a plausible alternative, but is it actually decentralized or altruistic enough to make a meaningful difference? I think not.

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 40 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Public benefit corporation" is such an oxymoron, I know it's cliché to say this but it reads like something out of 1984.

If your goal is truly to benefit the public, why wouldn't you start a non-profit? It's because they want profits, which will always be at odds with the interests of the public.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tomenzgg@midwest.social 38 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

Also Bluesky isn't an alternative to big tech, it IS big tech. I wish it wasn't stealing so much of our publicity lately.

This; I'm so sick of hearing it pop up when people mention alternatives.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure anyone mentions bluesky as an alternative to big tech.

Pretty sure they only mention it as an alternative to musk/X.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 28 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

This right here, the everyday person doesn't know what federation is let alone believes that it's an alternative to federated platforms. They see it as a better Twitter that's not run by Musk and honestly that's all they need to know.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 34 points 6 days ago

Indirectly, looking up "John Oliver Mastodon" brings up this post in the top few. "John Oliver Pixelfed" has this post as the first option

So we're not completely left out :)

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 28 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Exactly, don't let perfect be the enemy of good. Someone using BlueSky over Twitter is a good thing.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] lowleveldata@lemmy.world 149 points 6 days ago (3 children)
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 46 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

We should have a bot link federated alts for links... 🤔

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Uri@infosec.pub 50 points 5 days ago (16 children)

Bluesky will be the next Twitter. Just give it some time

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Exactly! All a person has to do is to look around - the right buys up all popular media platforms and converts them to propaganda outlets.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 96 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 93 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (12 children)

Yeah I think it's best we don't advertise this place. It's a little strange.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 141 points 6 days ago (28 children)

Come to Lemmy, we got: blood thirsty Linux users, furries, femboys, communists, and tankies. Also, porn.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 48 points 5 days ago (9 children)

The porn is sadly lacking, actuallly.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] guiguinofake@sh.itjust.works 27 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Don't forget the Trekkies.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 23 points 5 days ago
[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 45 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I say give it three years and blue sky will just be a neolib twitter

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Anybody who supports the definition of liberalism is an ally, imo.

[–] TheRealKuni@midwest.social 30 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah, infighting in the resistance is a waste of time.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 63 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

Does that ~~Late Show~~ Last Week Tonight with John Oliver have a presence in the Fediverse?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] legolas@fedit.pl 61 points 6 days ago (7 children)

It's crazy how the wind changed. Does anyone remeber the almost exact same thing 4 years ago, when people on the right side of political spectrum shared alternatives to big tech from their point ov view? GAB.COM, PARLER, BRAVE, DUCKDUCKGO etc

XD

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Duckduckgo? That's just a search engine, no?

I agree on the rest of the parts tho

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 46 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Yeah, odd inclusion. Duckduckgo is indeed a search enginge, but it's essentially just a front end for Bing.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 36 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (15 children)

Not friendica, which seems an obvious facebook alternative.

Also, I think they're onto something with their fuck it approach that every social media platform would benefit from. The internet was mostly that before. Content moderation primarily serves advertisers, it was never really for the people. Old internet anarchy was chaotic fun.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 54 points 6 days ago

This is fantastic to see.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Really hoping legislators in Sweden don't force Signal to pull its services from the country. 🫣

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 34 points 6 days ago

One of the few decent TV hosts. His reporting on Palestine breaks with the anti-Palestinian censorship that dominates US media.

load more comments
view more: next ›