this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
515 points (97.6% liked)

politics

21142 readers
3407 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 63 points 1 day ago (3 children)

at best the democrats don't understand the assignment. at worst they understand this to be the assignment

i fear for the core of the party, it's the latter, and that the majority is following that core because they don't know the assignment

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The dem party needs to be burned to the ground, I don't think it is reformable at this point.

load more comments (3 replies)

The last guy in charge was a corporate lobbyist so..

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaime_Harrison

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 54 points 1 day ago (6 children)

At this point a total collapse of the USA's 2-party-system seems the best of all realistic alternatives.

Because the Dems getting their shit together in less than 4 years certainly isn't realistic.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The two party system can't collapse without taking the whole government down with it. It's baked into the constitution. Not in words as such, but in mathematical reality. I just want to be real about "realistic outcomes." Fix the parties or rewrite the whole fucking shebang.

And that second option—there is a lot unsaid there about how that comes about, but it's not by everyone embracing universal brotherhood and sisterhood and mutually agreeing on a better way.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

The US government is like a beat up old car we try to keep on the road with Lucasoil and duct tape. We’ve needed to fix it a long time ago but we didn’t.

The car will eventually stop working and leave us stranded if we do nothing, but we also can’t afford to leave it at the mechanic for a week because we need to get to work in the morning.

The government will fall, people will be hurt by it, and we will have to make something new - note I didn’t say better - and it will happen at the least opportune time.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Couldn't agree more. Especially that last part. New doesn't mean better. We can hope.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, the two party system right now can probably only collapse into a one party system.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)

The democrats and thier party have been bought and paid for. They aren't going to save us from the billionaires.

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (29 children)

Then Why did you vote them out and give Republicans complete control over the government?

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

It would have been nice if Democrats were in a position but we're in a death spiral of articles like this being critical of them so fat fuck chance of ever winning another election.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, but they don't work too serve us. They work to serve corporations and billionaires. We can fix that, but it will take a lot of relentless work and vigilance, before, during and after fixing it.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

A core democrat stance is removing Citizens United, so it really doesn't align with your alternative facts.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›