this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
796 points (99.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6343 readers
592 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Access options:

Yes, this means a ton of carbon ends up in the atmosphere instead of in the trees. The right move would be thinning and prescribed burns, but this administration isn't going to do that.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stormdahl@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

That is just... Insane. Incredibly sad.

[–] Lennnny@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Meanwhile we get shamed for not reusing the plastic containers we're forced to purchase with our basic groceries.

May time and tide fuck a pres up the arse

[–] Neps@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

I hate this.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 88 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Uhm, why can he just decide this? Not part of his expertise or departement.

[–] suite403@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

That our government has been reacting to his shit rather than controlling it is infuriating.

[–] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Trump doesn't like that the US buys lumber from Canada. He's going to announce 34% tariffs on lumber from Canada in the next few days.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Other than the Pacific northwest most U.S. forest trees do not make good building lumber.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

National Forest Service is a part of the Department of Agriculture, part of the executive branch.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, but he can decide that alone?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

this is so fucking retarded. it is going to take longer than his term to build fucking logging factories and its going to cost millions of dollars. plus you have to hire these people and drivers. and guess what? since it's "american" it will just cost more for some reason anyways like everything else "American made" does. what an actual joke for the sheep

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 258 points 2 days ago (48 children)

These are our forests. They belong to the US people. They're being stolen from us. For private profit of a few.

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 day ago

It's an American tradition.

load more comments (47 replies)
[–] j_elgato@leminal.space 4 points 1 day ago

Assuming the other half is where they plan to install the oil derricks...

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Cutting down old growth Forrest take 50 years to repair the area after its stopped. What a mess.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More like 150-300 if possible at all.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 23 hours ago

Now that's waaaaay worst.

[–] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Way longer than that. What grows back is not old growth

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 10 points 1 day ago

Yep, can't fix it in our lifetime

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 161 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fuck. This kind of shit is why I feel the need for revenge on these people. They're slashing forests and impoverishing the population. It's not enough for them to lose an election. they need to pay

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arsCynic@beehaw.org 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Literally Saruman.
Revolt happened.
Saruman died on a spike.

Mirror mirror on the wall, who is Nostradamus about Trump's fall?

- -
✍︎ arscyni.cc: modernity ∝ nature.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Trump is speedrunning to aim for the lowest biodiversity index in North America.

Maybe if we stop ridiculously subisidising corn everywhere, some that gets thrown away because we have way too much, we could replace a couple dozen sq km of corn fields with more sustainable agroforestry, and thereby massively increase our logging output, instead of yk, cutting down the last wildlife sanctuaries? Not holding my breath tho.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›