this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10233 readers
583 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is one of those takes that's so controversial I'm afraid to post it, which is exactly why I have to.

I neither endorse nor disavow this, and no, I'm not in the picture.

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If there's a way to reduce the amount of sexual violence people inflict on children than it should be at least explored. Focusing on ensuring past sex offenders don't recommit the same crimes is not a bad thing at all.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Anger management, drug counselling, alcoholics anonymous, psychotherapy, and much more exist for 'normal' offenders.

For SO's it's chemical castration.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We don't do that foe the same reasons we don't do the death penalty. Too many ways an innocent can be wrongly punished.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Canada absolutely does do this.

But.

Chemical castration is not permanent. It's some drug/chemical that basically blocks a hormone or something. Supposed to reduce libido.

As far as I know it's the only pharmaceutical that can be legally ordered to take as condition of sentencing etc.

All it does is suppress something. It doesn't treat it.

It's like putting mittens on someone who robbed a bank.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Except it opens up the possibility or exploration of topics such as eugenics. It also has a lot of potential side effects on the body that may or may not be known. This could open the government to lawsuits as SO's can say they were negatively impacted by these drugs. You're correct in that it's not permanent. But it doesn't mean it's safe or the best course of action.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's entirely my point.

It doesn't treat it. Not really.

It suppress urges. Chemically.

There are other options.

Counselling, therapy, groups like AA, all the examples I gave in my first post. Those are very available to other offending types. But for an SO they don't exist, or would be very expensive, or difficult to navigate because of the stigma.

There's nothing to make someone not gay, or not straight,or not attracted to children. But there are means of regulating thinking, compulsions, urges, etc.

The barrier is the stigma for treatments.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Pedophiles will always exist. It's the unfortunate truth. But if we can reduce the amount if children subjected to sexual assault or rape then we should absolutely explore it. That's what this article is about. Removing the stigma for treatments that you accurately described as a barrier. How successful this approach is remains to be seen. But it's a worthy and sound discussion to have. And who knows, if it kicks off maybe we can even have people treat it before they actually hurt a child. It's a big maybe and will not happen for long time but we can try and make steps towards that goal.

There are more extreme methods such as chemical castration, sure. But that has its drawbacks as I mentioned in my comment above.