Yep, everyone in the region is hedging their bets in every possible way.
I'm not sure I'd call full nationalisation of an industry "simple", especially when it steps on American toes that much. But I guess yes, it is an option.
Ah, so that's why people keep getting themselves trapped in there.
Okay, it's just that the argument you wrote out there has implications far beyond the mail.
In practice, very little. People who are in unions tend to be a lot of other things first. Historically unions have endorsed the NDP, but the NDP never got close to actual federal power.
They can stop work. That's close to the only thing they can do, and they usually don't want to.
Depends. How much are we bending reality to make the question work? I'm going to need the resources of a superpower at absolute minimum. If I can change geography it obviously gets really easy, they're both on separate islands now.
Sooo genocide, but now going the other way?
If Jews committing a genocide doesn't clue you in that anyone is capable of it, I don't know what will. That includes Palestinians, who are understandably pissed right now.
Yeah, it would appear their plan was just to amputate everything except the NE, maybe because it would be indefensible.
It seems legally dicey anyway, for the exact reasons they mentioned. Going on strike is a charter right, and it's clear by this point the power will get used pretty much every time.
Unions have pretty limited purview, so I'm not sure I could ever describe them as "corrupt with power". At best they become stuck in the old way of doing things, which this seems like an example of.
So are you one of those people that want no taxes or government? Like, sure, mail delivery isn't a human right, but neither are things we all agree someone should care for, like a transportation network of any kind.
If you read carefully, this is clearly a Hindu. Which also explains the non-standard English.