this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
952 points (91.6% liked)

Political Memes

7887 readers
2460 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

AOC is a clear choice, I'd say Bernie but I'm already tired of old people in power.

AOC is young, in touch with actual issues, in touch with the generations that are moving the economy, knows the struggle since she used to be a waitress and so far I haven't seen her go crazy on anyone else's agenda or buying stocks and enriching herself beyond measure like damn old hag Pelosi.

[–] Junkers_Klunker 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which is exactly why she wont be a presidential candidate ever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

AOC《》Jon stewart

Bernie as whip

The dream team 😍

DNC will throw the election before putting a progressive into the race

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Y'all know there's still house and some Senate elections coming up next year right?

You know what would show America and the Democrats (and Republicans for that matter) that Americans are finally serious about a 3rd party candidate? Supporting and electing 3rd party candidates in the House and Senate.

Ok, I try to be polite, and I generally agree you don't win arguments by saying shitty things, but whoever downvoted this is either a bad actor or has rocks for brains. I'm sorry to be so crass, but it needed to be said.

If only there were elections being held between 2025 and 2028 with less at stake than a presidential election. That way Americans on the left and right could come together and prove to the establishment parties that they would actually show up to vote for a 3rd party candidate for a presidential election.

Oh shit! I'm a total klutz and I dropped this list of states with Governor and AG elections between 2025 and 2028

OH NO! I fumbled and spilled this list of 33 of the 100 six-year term (Jan 2027-2033) Senate seats up for election on Nov 3, 2026.

Fuck, I'm such a butterfingers! There goes the list of midterm elections also on Nov 3, 2026 where representatives from all 435 congressional districts across each of the 50 U.S. states, as well as five of the six non-voting delegates from the District of Columbia and the inhabited U.S. territories will be chosen.

It would be such a shame if angry Americans used this information to get involved in local politics and promoted ethical candidates who weren't purchased by a corporation ASAP

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jaykrown@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is why the primary will be so important, and why Biden basically handed the win to Trump by pushing Harris instead of having a primary.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It shouldn't have mattered who the candidate was. When the opponent is an authoritarian bigot intentionally harming minorities you do whatever it takes in the moment to triage the situation and prevent generational destruction. Then you march/riot...etc and demand change from whoever the Dem president is. I blame the absent voters for ignoring the bleeding patient from the drunk driver accident and instead standing to the side demanding no more drunk drivers.

load more comments (1 replies)

Maybe, but the only way I can believe that is if we believe Biden was a far better candidate that Harris. Biden mopped the floor in the Democrats primaries everywhere they were held. Florida and Delaware were the only states that didn't hold them if I remember, and Biden had something like 87% of the votes for Democrats. We say they meaningless, but the last time the Democrats were in the same position was 2012 voting in an incumbent. Obama got 2/3rds the votes that Biden did. 8 million, vs the 12 million votes for Biden.

The delegates could have flipped when Biden left but didn't. Its a much higher likelyhood that there the issue was more people were not willing to vote for her for being a woman or being black. If people think that 1-2% of the voters aren't racist or sexist in Georgia, Michigan etc they are off their rocker. A 1-2% moved from Democrat to Republican vote was enough to lose states like that.

So if Biden had not run at all, and sent it to Primaries, would that percentage have been enough to get her not to win the primary? I kind of doubt it.

[–] Tail11@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gavin Newsom may sound smart, but he's got his hands in your pockets stealing your money to feed the rich, kinda like the current emperor in chief.

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 1 points 1 day ago

Newsom is a slaveholder

[–] turnip@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

I love the hate the DNC gets now. I'm also confused how the DNC's mandate isnt to be entirely apolticial.

[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Can we do ranked choice primaries?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

That would solve a lot of problems, so ... no.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The DNC would rather acquiesce power to Republicans than risk handing it to an anti-corporate candidate so... No.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sadly, you are correct. Neither Kamala nor Gavin can win. But I'd prefer Kamala to Gavin, which is how bad Gavin is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlapJackFlapper@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm a progressive, but also a pragmatist and a realist, and I find these kind of complaints unhelpful and naive. Politics is a blood sport and it always has been. No one is going to hand AOC the reins of power. She has to win them, and her opponents aren't going to play fair. This is, sadly, how the game is played. Don't mourn. Organize!

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

and her opponents aren’t going to play fair

Sure, but they'll whine and cry if a progressive doesn't play fair. And they sure insist on playing fair when dealing with Republicans.

They are very selective on when to be unfair.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (5 children)

We all like AOC here on Lemmy, but are enough of the old ass "liberals" going to join us so she can actually get elected? Seems highly unlikely to be honest.

I'd love to see it happen though. That's what primaries are for. The Dems should try one of those. It's been a while.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago

Bernie and AOC seem to be hoovering up the MSNBC liberal boomer demographic at this point because that demo has finally snapped and the dems leadership is completely absent.

That, however, probably won't translate into a progressive/socialist candidate winning the next presidential primary. They might have a stronger showing but dem leadership will move to protect their donors and stifle that candidate.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm 45. Am I old enough to be an old ass liberal? I love AOC and I hope she succeeds.

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm talking 70's, 80's, and up. I'm also in my 40s.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Yes, let's get preemptively angry at those not currently in power for something we assume they'll do!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If Josh Shapiro wins the nomination I will not vote for him, I cannot stand this nonsense, this is absolute insanity. How the hell are modern Democrats less progressive than FDR (and he was a massive racist), we are a century ahead yet we are centuries behind. Now we're fighting over which fascist is more palatable so when can whitewash them and call them progressive. I voted for Kamala in 2024 but NOT AGAIN, I will NOT vote for another mild flavor of fascism lite.

They need someone who isn't flagrantly pro-Israel. Democratic voters are going to associate Israel with MAGA, given Netanyahu's very vocal support for Trump. While the genocide should be the red flag, being painted as team-MAGA is the bigger red flag due to how politics is a team sport in the U.S.

It's not a good look.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

Did you listen to the latest tiff between David Hogg and James Carville?

Carville really wants to push progressives out of the Democratic party while keeping their heads in the sand. I think his last rant was because Hogg wants to replace existing Dems (Carville says he should be replacing Republicans). However, I think Hogg wants to do this because these Dems aren't really doing anything and waiting to pick up the pieces from this Trump administration. I think agree more with Hogg that it's more important to show the people that you represent them rather than be like: "we're not the Republicans".

I'm not an entire fan of Hogg though, he seems a bit inconsistent but I agree with him here.

To be clear, people should have voted for the Democrats. We're all in the position we're in because not enough people did. Would you get what you want? No. But we still wouldn't be in the mess otherwise. I mean, assuming the election wasn't stolen.

That being said, all these older people that don't seem interested in fighting for their people need to be purged from the Democrats. I don't know if it's because they're really old or out of touch or what. There's a thirst for people to want representation for them to fight (as seen by the AOC and Bernie rallies). I think their inactivity isn't helping for the most part. Also, they need to get some more names out there.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] dryfter@lemm.ee 17 points 2 days ago (5 children)

This whole discussion has been a fascinating read in the comments.

But does anyone really think we're going to have another election? Much less a non-rigged election?

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The system was already rigged, of course. Electoral college, absentee cancelations, felons disqualified. It was broken before so even if things stayed the same (which they won't) it'll still be broken.

I do expect elections to continue. Just much less honestly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] projektilski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

But people are stupid and they DID vote wrong. They had a choice and they chose wrong.

[–] Battle_Maiden@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

No, we voted for Bernie. He won the primary and for some reason Hilary was the candidate. That was the beginning of the end. We didn’t vote for Harris to be our candidate either. THAT is how Trump wins. The majority did not want trump either time he ran for president, but the DNC made sure he won by putting in their least popular candidate. It’s a dog and pony show. Both sides are working for the same people.

[–] projektilski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

I'm talking about those that voted for Trump.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

Of course not. They can't accept that their most passionate base actually wants progressive platforms, not centrist pop pandering. Dems are too worried about being "safe" and trying to steal votes from conservative-centrists. If they actually showed bills and votes to invigorate the actual progressives, they just might get some loyal backing.

load more comments
view more: next ›