this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
563 points (95.6% liked)

politics

23167 readers
3297 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

Remember when Obama rocked that tan suit yall?

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago

Because of Trump the world thinks us a fool.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 2 points 3 hours ago

“But the blue suit is MY BRAND!”

[–] lemmingthelemmers@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

He's dressed in the colors of the nation he represents.

Blue and white.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This is the sort of news that does nothing but bring attention away from real problems. Blame these idiots for being a bunch of liars and criminals (including the pope) not for wearing the wrong suit color.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jamablaya@lemmy.today 16 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

This whole thing is stupid.

[–] Alaknar@lemm.ee 5 points 6 hours ago

This guy is not the president of the United States.

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Apparently the dress code is dark suit + black tie. So this is fine. Trump's tie was blue

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Just one in my lifetime I wanna see the rapists, the convicted felons, the wannabe gangsters elected to office, the people linked to Jeffrey Epstein, the presidents who put personal interest before country, the tactless lying connen grifters and the orange buffoons leave this plane before the good men with some semblance of balance, tolerance, moderation and compassion.

Just once in my lifetime.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 11 points 10 hours ago

At least kissinger finally kicked it

[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 38 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Thank god it wasn’t tan.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 64 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Honestly, now that we're literally sending people to concentration camps, I have zero fucks to give about this superficial bullshit. No one gives a shit about what Hitler wore at the '36 Olympics, and no one's gonna care what this asshole wore to a funeral.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It's purely to be on the attack. Republicans showed for the last fifteen years if you're performatively aggressive against the opposition eventually you get what you want.

You don't have to hate Trump or his suit color. Just love democracy and socialism and the working class. If this gets some apolitical conservative people to not vote for the Republicans then awesome.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

The thing was that they resorted to the tan suit and terrorist first bump bullshit because Obama gave them so little to work with. For Trump you didn't need to waste everyone's time when his administration is ignoring court orders, arresting judges, declaring warrants and due process unnecessary, and tanking the economy.

The tan suit stuff may have helped energize the base by preaching to the choir, but everyone else found it ridiculous and made them skeptical of conservative media. When you are inundated nearly daily with real terrible stuff, boo need to undermine credibility by latching into this sort of fluff.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I agree, and once would have dismissed the sociopolitical pragmatism described by the commenter above as “lowering our discourse to their level” or something of the sort.

I eventually realized that this instinctive criticism was valid only if they were still growing as people, and capable of more than what they are now. The assumption is that setting higher expectations might convince them to “elevate their discourse” if only to save face.

But what I’ve come to realize is that this was far too much to expect. By all the evidence available to date, these folks never advanced far beyond the emotional maturity of the average middle schooler. At this level of maturity, superficial and public humiliation is quite literally the most serious attack, as it bloodies waters presumed to be infested with sharks.

Yes it’s pathetic, and yes “stooping to their level” feels gross, but Republican voters are only enthused by policies which benefit them directly or hurt others they feel deserve it. Perceived power matters a lot to them, and seems to be attached to explicit expressions of it that are similarly pathetic— as in, truck nuts, “I am very smart,” “I have a great brain and concepts of a plan,” etc.

So public humiliation of trump for an otherwise petty and irrelevant issue (especially by someone he can’t touch without losing a chunk of his base) absolutely succeeds in making him look weak, and making Trump look weak is directly correlated with his voters’ loss of motivation to vote (see RWA personality type/disorder; it’s fascinating).

Enough of these successful offensives will cause his most die-hard voters to lose faith in him (caveat: to seek out somebody stronger) so to de-motivate a current right-wing conservative voter, likely we must accept that petty “mean girl” tactics are the only language they understand, due to their arrested emotional development, and robbing them of their “strongman” is both easy and effective. Ridicule the emperor with no clothes and his voters, who are themselves unclothed, might go home and rethink their fashion statement.

TLDR: It sucks but crass pragmatism may be warranted in this case. The first language of Trump voters is small-mindedness, and it’s often the only one they understand, so we might consider rolling our sleeves up and speaking it if only so future generations don’t have to.

Edit: corrected swype errors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

How did he even get an invite?

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Probably paid for it, like his Nobel nomination.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 182 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For those not appearing to get it, Trump allowed his sycophants to berate Zelenskyy for not wearing a suit in his White House meeting. Folks are treating Trump's attire faux pas accordingly.

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 119 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

More than that, Trump isn't in the middle of actively fighting a fucking war, and a funeral has one single, solitary wardrobe expectation: wear black.*

Even if not for that utter dumpster fire of a press conference, I also remember the fuss made about Obama's tan suit that he just happened to wear during a televised event (which was not a funeral). On every level, this clown deserves mockery.

*not universal to all kinds of funeral ceremonies, I know. this, however, was one of those funerals.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 84 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

This was not an accident. First, it gets him to stand out from the crowd, draw all the attention to himself, and make it all about him which is what he lives and breathes for. Second, it gets the media to focus on something other than him eliminating due process, having judges arrested, using the DOJ to attack perceived enemies, deporting US citizens, and completely ignoring court rulings while those who have the power to stop it sit back and either do nothing or actively support it.

[–] Krimika@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Came here to find this.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 20 points 20 hours ago

gets the media to focus on something other

I didn't see the clown makeup until you mentioned it; but that's what it is, isn't it? The circus continues.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 46 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] kerntucky@infosec.pub 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] deathbysnusnu@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

That's hilarious, who is the artist with the brush?

[–] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Notorious couch-fucker, JD Vance

[–] kerntucky@infosec.pub 1 points 10 hours ago

It looks like Vance to me.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 113 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, it's the suit that's embarrassing, not the "239 lbs" of rancid garbage sloshing around inside.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 26 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

No fucking way he's less than 250lbs

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago

That's why they put it in quotes. During his first term his personal doctor listed Trump's weight at 239, which everyone with at least one functioning eyeball knows is complete horseshit. But naturally he lies about that like he lies about everything else

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Funerals are for the family. Not the dead person. You won’t care because you’re dead, I’m sure his close friends and relatives cared quite a bit.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Well he's finally being held to the same standards as Obama

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Wdym? Obama pulled it off. Trump just looks tired. And angry. But more tired.

load more comments
view more: next ›