this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
455 points (98.7% liked)

politics

23316 readers
3013 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Consider he can't handle to NOT voting for another fascist cabinet member, yeah, screw this ineffective asshole.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago

Why is this guy called a leader when all he does is immitate a mall Santa on Christmas Day?

[–] Zink@programming.dev 16 points 1 day ago

Chuck Schumer Struggles to Meet the Moment as Tuesday Unexpectedly on Calendar Once Again.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

As an old white guy, I’m really tired of old white guys.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Chuck is an absolute fucking loser.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Off ya fuck, Chuck.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why is nobody sending him a series of strongly worded questions!?!

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

They are though. He's done, he knows it, but he won't leave and it takes time to force powerful old men to retire.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 45 points 2 days ago (2 children)

“Polls come and go. Our party is united. We’re on our front foot, we’re stepping forward, going after Trump and having real success,” Schumer insisted.

Nothing said here reflects reality.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We’re on our front foot

He's on his ass ... which is remarkable since he's talking out of it at the same time.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 day ago

That piece of shit was coming here on his stupid book tour. Friend and I had plans to go challenge him before he cancelled when he realized he's unpopular. Schedule a new tour, Chucky. We're dying to see you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago

Christ if this is success, what does failure look like

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Chuck Schumer is running the bet that the GOP will implode before the whole country goes up in flames.

It's solely a hedge to save his party and capture as much power as possible.

Maybe it works but it was never for you. Unless you believe the democrats are actually "elites" that deserve to be in charge.

Personally, I think their time has come and gone and it's a crying shame they were never once put together well enough to do something for those that come after.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 161 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Schumer is a deer in the headlights at this point. If we’re being generous, he’s useless. If we’re being honest, he’s a fascist enabler. And fascist enablers are fascists with extra steps.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

I’m going to say something controversial to some of us: It’s because Jewish people are the fascists this time around. Israel is a militarized police and tech surveillance state whose leader will be ousted if the war stops so he went on the offensive. Chuck is receiving money from AIPAC and doesn’t want the campaign cash to stop so he’s looking the other way while the fascists take over.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Trump's a goy. So's Vance. A lot of the white nationalist MAGAts would be happy to murder Jews if they got the chance.

Likud's influence on both Dems and Republicans is indeed pernicious, but it's money in politics and the peddling of foreign influence that are the underlying problems, not Jewish people.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 42 points 3 days ago

Zionists are the fascists, not Jewish people.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 60 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Every Jewish person I know is opposed to aid for Israel, supporting their genocide and very vocally supportive of Gaza/palestine and very critical of Israel-the-country

It’s not that he’s Jewish. He’s just a prick.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

There's a super reform synagogue in my town, their president is an out lesbian, they turned out for blm marches, host families traveling to get medical care for their sick kids, etc.

And they're generally super pro-Netanyahu, pro-NeoNaqba.

It's baffling to me that you can understand that there is rampant racist police violence in the US, and not in Gaza or Jenin.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

As a Palestinian I keep feeling the need to bring up that we have no issues what-so-ever with Judaism or people of Jewish faith. But I hate Zionism to my core, and I strongly commend Jewish people against Israel. Please personally thank your Jewish friends for making a choice

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's telling how people in the imperial core generally can't distinguish between judaism and zionism. That's how deeply ingrained the indoctrination and propaganda goes. The widespread conflation of judaism and zionism is a completely normalized form of anti-semitism.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The widespread conflation of judaism and zionism is a completely normalized form of anti-semitism.

And it is intentionally pushed by Israeli PACs.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 13 hours ago

And Netanyahu himself.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 69 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Zionists to be specific. It’s not all Jewish people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigxRedxHusker@midwest.social 20 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Schumer Pelosi and Warren need to retire or be voted out.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 days ago

This is Hakeem Jeffries erasure.

See also: Durbin, Cuellar, Clyburn, Hoyer, the entire Blue Dog Coalition, King, Coons, Klobuchar, Tester, Rosen, Hassan, Peters, to just name a few of the feckless Dems (and one independent Senator who caucuses with Dems but often votes with the fascists) who still value "bipartisanship" over the wellbeing of the people they're pretending to represent.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 days ago

"Struggles" doing Atlas level lifting here.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 30 points 2 days ago

I have despised this craven, insipid, spineless weenie ever since he collaborated with a clumsy Republican smear campaign to ruin Al Franken's career.

Since then, he has been ineffective at best, and has been a cowardly collaborator at worst. It's time for this loser to be removed from office, let AOC take his place, and be replaced as Senate Minority Leader by someone bold enough to go toe-to-toe with the MAGA Nazis.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

He's not struggling to meet the moment, he's struggling to hold his own party down. Make no mistake, that traitorous bastard is a collaborationist Vichy-Democrat, a blue-dog-Republican snake. He wants as little to be done about the exploitation of the nation as possible, so he and his doners can reap the rewards.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

he and his doners

Please leave kebabs out of this.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Lol, that one took me a second.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Please primary all these dinosaurs, they were old when I was still young. I don't know your process but please get more progressives in the house and send this current batch out to pasture

[–] michel@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

Schumer’s seat is only up in 2028 but if enough of his allies - preferably in safe seats - get primaried in 26 and the new progressives hold them in the general election (and hopefully win some back from GOP) I expect he will be forced out of leadership for the next Congress

It has to have enough shift to progressives or else he will take credit and stay on. He will also be ousted if Democrats lose again but in that scenario MAGA will continue unchecked for 2 more years at least

[–] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 82 points 3 days ago

This is the man who said his purpose as a Senator is to serve Israel. He should move to Israel. I wouldn't be surprised if he already has Israeli citizenship.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago

"Struggles" is being generous. He is intentionally not fighting. The elderly leadership and all the AIPAC loyalists within the party major road blocks to any form of fighting back.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

How sad for him. The times call for someone in his position to do more than going through the motions and other ineffective and performative bullshit

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

More like coward sell out shows his true intentions.

[–] Fourth@mander.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

He cannot meet the moment.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 days ago

There's no struggle. Dude has always been fash.

People like him are the reason why the Democrats dont truly qualify in my eyes as an opposition party.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 22 points 3 days ago

Good job New York. Keep electing this geriatric dust collector.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not ‘struggles’, simply ‘fails’

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

Still too generous; "fails" implies that he even tried

[–] ceph@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

JESUS CHRIST! Get these old, ineffective fucking fogeys out.

load more comments
view more: next ›