this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1922 readers
94 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 9 points 1 week ago

So far away we wait for the AGI
For the billions all wasted and gone
We feel the pain of compute time lost in few thousand days
Through the sneering and the flames we carry on

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Opening up the sack with your new favourite uwu news influencer giving a quick shout-out to our old pals, the NRx. Hoped that we wouldn’t get here, but here we are, regardless.

[–] mountainriver@awful.systems 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I didn't know that uwu news influencer was a thing. Kind of a clash between style and topic there, but hey whatever gets the word out.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 8 points 1 week ago

I didn’t know that uwu news influencer was a thing.

It's probably a thing where if you start thinking about it, it's always been around, but we've just never had the right vocabulary to describe it.

[–] nightsky@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago

I didn’t know that uwu news influencer was a thing.

Same, and also I'm still trying to process that "uwu" breached out of furry spaces and became a widely understood term. (Although I'm not entirely sure what way it took, it's also possible that it breached out of anime-related communities. Maybe some day cyber-archeologists can figure this out.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 9 points 1 week ago

Got two major pieces to show which caught my attention:

[–] mii@awful.systems 8 points 1 week ago

Pretty good summary of why Alex Karp is as much a horrible fucking shithead as Thiel.

https://www.thenation.com/article/culture/alex-karp-palantir-tech-republic/tnamp/

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago

New Bluesky post from Baldur Bjarnason:

What’s missing from the now ubiquitous “LLMs are good for code” is that code is a liability. The purpose of software is to accomplish goals with the minimal amount of code that’s realistically possible

LLMs may be good for code, but they seem to be a genuine hazard for collaborative software dev

[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago

Further evidence emerging that the effort to replace government employees with the Great Confabulatron are well at hand and the presumed first-order goal of getting a yes-man to sign off on whatever bullshit is going well.

Now we wait for the actual policy implications and the predictable second-order effects. Which is to say dead kids.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In an completely unprecedented turn of events, the word prediction machine has a hard time predicting numbers.

https://www.wired.com/story/google-ai-overviews-says-its-still-2024/

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›