this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
301 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

38619 readers
209 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 36 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That's a pretty good idea for monetization.

[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago

Completely fine with that, I agree

[–] Matty_r@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

Nice. I don't think I need this but its good to have options

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 143 points 4 days ago

As long as they leave the local backup option that sounds like a good idea to me.

[–] simple@piefed.social 78 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Makes sense., something as huge and expensive as Signal can't run entirely on donations.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Sure it can, just look at Wikipedia. But it's probably a good idea to have some alternate forms of revenue generation.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

Wikipedia has way more donors, since it's basically the only one of its kind. There is no Big Tech alternative to Wikipedia, so everyone just uses it by default. There are lots of other messengers though, so Signal isn't the default choice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 days ago

Finally a good approach at raising money (other than donations)

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 57 points 3 days ago

Good to see they have some reasonable revenue streams lined up.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I don't mind paying a fair price, for a service, so they should go for it. I use both Signal and Telegram, and I would pay for Telegram too, if the price was more fair...

[–] rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Don't use Telegram, let alone pay for it. So many red flags with Telegram.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Feel free to list them - with evidence and not just prejudice...?

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (9 children)
  1. No end-to-end encryption by default, you have to explicitly start a secret chat. That means that instead of it all being encrypted noise, secret chats stand out.
  2. Servers are not open source (last time I checked). Why not? Seriously, why not?
  3. Admittedly, not much of an issue any more, but in the beginning they had horrible security (so did WhatsApp until Facebook threw some competent engineers at the problem)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 42 points 4 days ago

At least this time they do it out in the open, not like with the MobileCoin integration.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cloud backups, for security!

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If anyone is actually going to get that right in a mainstream product, it will probably be Signal.

[–] jimmy@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago

Year according to a wiki page on the unofficial Signal wiki the backup will not be directly linked to the user "It appears that backups will not be directly linkable to a user. Authentication for operations against a given backup will use zero-knowledge proofs.".

[–] cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago

As long as they dont shove it down our throats, and then expand and expand and expand the features that are in their paid tier, and make you feel lesser for choosing their local only unpaid mode, and dont make the unpaid mode inconvenient with dark patterns.

Its happened too much, I've asked my friends to hop through so many different platforms over the years and decades

It always starts with something thats reasonable, and every time thus far, it expands into something I hate.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (13 children)

All of my signal conversations have auto expiry

Do people really use their conversation logs for things? Are you often searching your conversational logs?

Outside of corporate compliance issues I can't imagine the workflow for most people

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Yes, and yes.

"I said this was happening 3 weeks ago. Here's the literal text of me sending it to you and you saying 'Okay thanks' in reply."

Shuts down an argument real quick.

[–] mightysashiman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

History search is great when you have a lot of friends and poor memory. Perhaps not your use case ?

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

I never set auto expiry and often search messages. Sometimes it's because I want to find a specific fact or datum from two years ago; other times it's just for a reminder of a memory. On occasion, if the history wasn't there, people might remember something important differently.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Me and my wife and wife sends information, pictures , whatever. I often search my messages for stuff

[–] jimmy@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago

Though the same I like my conversations disappear when I need to reinstall Signal.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yes, and yes. But most of it's because I've moved all communication over to it.

If I have anything that shouldn't stick around it doesn't stick around, If I need my grocery list from last month it's there though.

That said, I really don't have any interest in backups. It's an ephemeral stream at best that is there when I need it. And there are parts of it disappear when they're no longer needed.

The days where we presumed we could safely bitch about things to our friends over social media are clearly gone and privacy is of ultimate importance.

Pretend it's 1984, and you won't get yourself in trouble.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] goldenquetzal@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Yes and yes

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Stomata@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If this feature rolls out but you can't pay for it. You can always use Molly (fork of signal). If you can support the project than do it. But if you can't than don't force your self

[–] dracs@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Switching to Molly won't necessarily give you free cloud backups. Someone will still need to pay for the storage costs.

[–] Stomata@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)

I have no issue with this, I personally wouldn't use it but I get that they need to make money (which is why i have a recurrent donation every month).

If this helps them to do that, then so be it

[–] qweertz@programming.dev 16 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Glad to see they are establishing useful streams of revenue

I, however, will continue using Molly in combination with Syncthing

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Signal backups are an issue. They keep growing. I need to look into a solution sooner or later that isn't just buying a phone with more space. I'd like to find ways to reduce the size and keep managing the backups myself, but that's gonna take time. If they offer a secure, private, and affordable service, I'd prolly just redirect my donations to that.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago

Excellent news honestly. Trying to get people to switch to something encrypted and the one thing I've thought of is that I want to know it can continue indefinitely. Everything else in life costs money- we just never think of it computer wise because we pay with our data and privacy.

This can join threema with a solid revenue stream. I back mine up locally but would pay for this anyhow.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Like cloud backup on their server or a subscription just to export the files to store offline?

[–] jimmy@feddit.org 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think it's cloud backups.

In the GitHub commit it's called Renew your Signal Backups subscription.

load more comments
view more: next ›