timbuck2themoon

How mature. Great rebuttal.

All you're doing is saying "I don't care if you start doing the right thing."

If you give them nothing to value from changing then they won't. Congrats on the own goal.

Way too much for me to care. I admit gnome isn't perfect but I'll still argue it's far more consistent than KDE.

Yep. Ugly, disjointed in appearance, etc. I set up Debian KDE for a family member moving from windows so it fits. I was impressed that KDE came far from what it was but it very much is like a bucket of bolts to me.

Gnome in contrast is very put together. Yes, has some quirks but appearance wise is very curated IMO.

Having visited Munich I don't doubt your frustration but by god I'd kill to have that public transport. You even had a lot of bike lanes.

We still play it to this day. Amazing multiplayer.

The single player campaign was also pretty fun.

I think most users wouldn't care about qt vs GTK.

I will say- zorin is solid. It's very, very close to that windows look and feel which would make that transition easier. I think that, KDE Debian, mint, fedora (to some extent) are all great transition distros. But zorin absolutely mimics the feel of windows the best (not my cup of tea personally but I'm not the target demo.)

Let's not give them all the credit. All the dumbass nonvoters deserve their fair share of responsibility too.

I'd like to watch but I'm not paying for NFL network.

I wonder if your response would fly in that thread.

I'm guessing not.

I was fine with the original. Didn't mind the bulky nature as it had the jack. I now have basically no desire to get the successor. Downgrade in a lot of ways. And the only reason I didn't buy the original was it didn't yet have support for MMS for my telco.

Maybe another model or rerun of the original will bring me back.

Media isn't owned by people sympathetic to Democratic talking points.

Doesn't matter what your message is if no one plays it.