A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
"This isn't a step backward. It's a step toward doing things more inclusively"
Bikes do not contribute to congestion and most places actually experience less congestion when a bike lane is built (cause thats 1 less person that needs to be in a car). I'm so sick of the "we can't build bike lanes, transit, sidewalks etc because it causes congestion" excuse.
It's one thing to push for car dependency, and to push for oil profits. But what boils my blood is the people who dress it up as being about equity.
What the hell is going on in canada? This is bizarre
Same as exactly everywhere else: conservatives have universally understood that they don't have any solutions but don't need them as culture-war brainrot and unfettered populism works much better anyway. So they now simultaneously fight every bit of progress ever made no matter if it's in society, technology, infrastructure or whatever...
My country does not have a culture war over bike lanes, that sounds insane… But I get it in some sense its similar to other conservative tactics
Has anyone read the actual text? This sounds quite reasonable without knowing the broader context.
Road budgets and projects go way over all the time and the vast majority of those projects still go through.
His excuses for what is causing congestion are statistically wrong, he blames the solutions to congestion as the causes.
The province has hinted at planing some other transit projects so lets cancel new projects that would work better in unison.
He explicitly states that new solutions cannot slow down private automobiles, despite them be unfairly catered to for decades while every other transportation method is left underfunded, unreliable, and is already much slower than private automobiles.
He then has the audacity to claim this will lead to amore inclusive solution when he is explicitly excluding cyclists from safe infrastructure.