A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system
Also check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
I made the switch. Linux mint. Steam works great with all my games via proton. It was painless. Even a lazy person like me had mint setup with drivers, everything working in no time really.
Screenshots of your porn can now feed into your social life via AI that is continuously logging and analyzing.
I'm thinking about switching. A couple of weekends ago I had Mint on a flashdrive and tried out a bit.
I'm worried about compatibility with games as I'm a Steam user and whatever launcher that game requires sometimes.
Should I just do it? Just do a brand new install but on Linux? Which distro should I use that would be good for gaming?
Other than gaming, everything else I do is just everyday browsing on reddit/lemmy, YouTube, email, etc.
Do you have a spare SSD? Throw Linux on it and try it out for a while. You can always go back.
I do. I wanna say I did that a long time ago where I had two OSs on two drives? Would I have to disconnect the Windows drive to boot into the other? Or would it act like a dual boot and I can choose from a menu?
You can set up dual boot with your boot manager. This gives you all your installed OSs in the boot menu to select from.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Dual_boot_with_Windows
EDIT: BTW arch isn't hard to install anymore, just use the "archinstall" command at the prompt when it's finished loading.
Depends on your gaming habits. Check ProtonDB for Steam games compatibility, check Lutris for others. Some anti-cheats (especially kernel level anti-cheats) don't work on Linux, if devs decide to make it work on Linux, they can. For example they enabled Linux version of anti-cheat and Hell Let Loose works fine for some time now. If you mostly play single-player games, you'll probably be fine.
If you want every possible gaming related programs to be pre-installed, you might wanna go Bazzite. If you want to explore on your own pace, Mint is a solid choice. If you want something like Bazzite but mostly empty, there is also Aurora.
My decision was to install Linux Mint first on my work laptop and not my main gaming rig, so I would have the ability to switch between both OS's as needed, and have a fallback machine if either failed.
ProtonDB (Compatibility Database) should be your friend in checking what works and what doesn't, and for the most part, Windows games "just work", no need to even toggle a setting (unless you count forcing Proton instead of a native Linux port).
If you have software that is critical to your daily life on windows (Photoshop, Autodesk, VR software, anti-cheat heavy games), you dont need to jump ship on your main hardware. There are ways to get support after October 15th (Through IOT LTSC versions of windows 10, but you'll have to find a way to get it).
All of your other use cases would be perfectly served by any Linux distro, the Interstellar Lemmy client even has a convenient flatpack for a 1-click install.
Check ProtonDB first (you can even log in to view all your library at once). If everything you would want to play works, go for it! If not everything works currently, I'd recommend getting your hands on IOT LTSC win10, and use a spare device to get familiar with Linux distros.
There's no one "gaming" Linux distro that will work, but I personally just use Linux Mint because it is ol' reliable for me - intuitive enough GUI, but just as configurable as anything else. You do miss out on some of the more bleeding edge stuff that distros such as Arch and Bazzite get, but unless you are using very new hardware, I'm not sure if it would be necessary.
Its always time to consider Linux. No one has to wait until Windows support ends. :-)
No, but a bad MS/Windows decision is often a catalyst. I came over to Linux from Windows ME. :)
The big area to push should be on Office.
The new versions of Office with that ribbon are terribly user unfriendly (or maybe just non-basic user unfriendly) so hitting that and pushing Libre Office could net some good adoption.
But I guess that's competing against GoogleDocs and the like these days... But we don't wanna give the Big G that data.
I'm not that old linux user so it's a bit interesting for me, when Windows 7 was closing, linux community was also so excited and offered everyone to switch to linux?
Not really the same scenario. PCs that could run Windows 7 could usually upgrade to 10, people were just reluctant to do so, partly also because 8 and 8.1 were such disasters. Eventually, everyone just moved on.
Today, a lot of 10 users would upgrade to 11 if they could, but their older-but-still-fine hardware is simply being cut off from Windows support.
Today, a lot of 10 users would upgrade to 11 if they could, but their older-but-still-fine hardware is simply being cut off from Windows support.
Technically, a lot of people was also "cut off" for Windows support with Windows 10, however, Windows 10 did not block you from upgrading anyway. Looking at the CPU requirements of Windows 10 1511, the Intel i3/5/7 types all required at least 5000 series or better from around 2015. Newer Windows 10 version cut out some of the 1511 supported CPUs, raising the minimum requirements. I think it was some of the CPUs from Microsoft's own Surface computers, that was kept in the supported list.
Microsoft should just let Windows 11 install with a big fat warning that you are running unsupported hardware, however this could have a negative experience when people run into features that does not work. But most of the way, people would be fine.
Every time for a long time. Regular users would have more reliability with Linux but they are apathetic. Also they only need LibreOffice and Firefox but don't want to accept that fact ant dont believe it exists on Linux.
My engineer father (who was secretly a dumbass for 60 years) asked me if Linux can even run programs. He has a Windows machine full of viruses...
I've said it before, but MAN am I excited to get to Windows 10 end of support so the old people and professionals stuck with highly specific hardware can just keep using their Windows 10 and the Linux community finally moves on from this stuff.
I am exhausted of these threads. Maybe we do a two week nostalgia revival when their paid commercial support ends again, but for now, can we make a deal right here to absolutely stop this crap by the end of the year when the needle moves exactly zero percent? Pretty please?
You are excited for October 15th because less people will be trumpeting Linux migrations.
I am excited for October 15th for the avalanche of cheap liquidated hardware flooding eBay.
We are not the same
Me too. I am already enjoying the discounted Intel laptops. They will really come down when macOS 27 comes out and OpenCore Legacy Patcher stops working on them.
There should certainly be some good desktop deals this Christmas for sure.
Hah. I fear you and I are not the same, but you and the trumpeters may be equally disappointed.
You may be getting bored of the posts but this is a rare opportunity to mass drive Linux adoption and break many people’s dependence on Microsoft.
Even if it’s 0.1%, there’s 1.4 billion Windows 10 machines out there. A million+ new Linux users would be great progress.
If you’re exhausted, just scroll on by. But if you’re a fan and user of FOSS, you should be giving these posts a quick upvote and move on with your day rather than be negative and dissuading the popularisation on Linux.
It is fricking not, though, that's my point.
I have heard exactly zero normies talk about this. Nobody cares. Just like nobody cared when Windows 7 ended support. People just... kept using it. Today Windows 7 is as high up the Steam hardware survey as Linux Mint.
Windows 10 doesn't shut down in October, it just... stops receiving security patches for free. Anybody clueless enough to not have migrated or stuck there for hardware reasons either already mitigated the issue or does not care. This is Linux's Y2K moment. Everybody is expecting this big shift to be a moment and it's really not going to be.
So I'm getting exhausted for nothing, which just makes it more annoying. Not a single normie space is even thinking about this. This is 100% Linux users talking to other Linux users about this big game-changing moment that's never gonna happen. The EoL day will come, a couple of tech outlets will run a piece saying "hey, MS ends Windows 10 official support" and maybe a listicle of things to do ("1. Move to Win11, 2. Pay Windows for patches 3. Move to another OS")...
...and nothing will happen.
We'll all be here and we'll all quietly stop talking about it and all this friction generated by this delusional hype will just fizzle out.
At the start of the process I was mildly excited, not about the influx of Windows 10 users, which was obviously not going to be a thing, but about maybe the hype leading to Linux development spaces focusing on long overdue work to ease that transition in time for the deadline. That didn't really happen, so now we're all just advertising this weird narrative to each other multiple times a day.
The quiet acknowledgement that... well, yeah, it won't happen, but don't break kayfabe just in case there's a Windows guy looking, just reinforces that point. I would much rather have spent all this energy addressing WHY it won't happen, or how to address the work that is needed to make it happen. I'd argue THAT is what a "fan and user of FOSS" should be pushing the community to do. In that, you know, it may actually work.
I’ve helped two “normies” movie this week because they reached out after they saw the chatter on social (Instagram of all places).
This topic seems to be causing you some stress for something that probably doesn’t have a big impact on you personally.
This isn’t going to be a tidal wave as change is slow. People are hyping it because hype drives attention and being hopeful and positive drives change better than negativity and pessimism.
Again, just scroll past the posts rather than engage if the content isn’t what you’re interested in.
Tried it. Hated it. It's like replacing an old, worn out blanket with a scratchy burlap new blanket. Sure, it works, but bleh.
So, help me understand here, what will exactly happen when I try to turn on my Windows 10 computer on October 15th?
No updates for consumer versions of Win10. Including security ones. If on October 15th a zero-day exploit is out in the wild, Microsoft would not be obligated to patch it. They may regardless (see WannaCry Malware patch for Windows XP), but it will not be ongoing, and probably not all-encompassing.
The longer you use the machine on win10 after October, the more exposed you are to any exploit found in the existing windows 10 version.
What this post is trying to present is that Linux distributions almost never run into these issues - especially when it comes to running on legacy hardware. If you install Linux Mint today, you'll still be able to update it in october and beyond, for the foreseeable future.
Edit: There will be a subscription option to receive extended security patches from MS for Windows10, but it will not be free, and the price will rise as time passes (similar to win7).
Sad truth but regular users don't care about security updates.
The more who are aware, the more who will care. And hey, not like typing an honest answer hurt anyone here.
If you install Linux Mint today, you’ll still be able to update it in october and beyond, for the foreseeable future
One caveat: Linux distributions, even LTS variants, usually have a shorter support period than Windows, after which you have to upgrade your distribution, which is much like doing a Windows upgrade.
A particular version of Linux Mint, the example you mentioned, is supported for 4 years, whereas Windows 10 was supported for 10 years.
A particular version of Linux Mint, the example you mentioned, is supported for 4 years, whereas Windows 10 was supported for 10 years
I know this is a definition question, but yes, Enterprise LTS versions of Windows 10 will be supported for 10 years. For normal versions, you will have to update to a newer Windows 10 version to be supported - just like Linux Mint.
I think you misunderstood. Windows 10 was released in 2015, and will have general support for all versions until October 2025. That's 10 years.
The current version of Mint, 22.1, was released in January 2025, and will receive support until April 2029. That's 4 years.
Had you installed the latest version of Mint in 2015, it would have been EOL in 2019. Had you installed Windows 10 in 2015, it would only be EOL later this year.
I think you misunderstood. Windows 10 was released in 2015, and will have general support for all versions until October 2025. That’s 10 years.
No, not all Windows 10 versions will have 10 years of support. Example for home and pro: Windows 10 version 1507 was released in 2015 and support ended in 2017. Only Version 22H2 is supported into 2025.
Again, it is a definition question. For me "Windows 10" is a product name, like "Linux Mint" or "Windows Vista". The version number e.g. 1507 or 22H2 is the version number, like 22.1 is for Linux Mint or "SP6a" for Windows NT 4.0. And it makes sense to differentiate between versions of Windows 10 and not treat them as the same, as there are big differences between version 1507 and 22H2.
There are LTS(B) versions available for Windows 10 that offers 10 years support and even some that is supported beyond 2025.
So you're considering the 22H2 builds et al. separate versions, I just consider them service packs. They come with the regular updates, and the user experience doesn't significantly change. I couldn't ever tell you what "build" of Windows 10 or 11 I was on, but I usually know pretty well which distro version I am on.
But I guess it's true that they contain more feature updates than typical Linux updates.
Different Windows 10 versions also have different hardware requirements e.g. CPU support is removed for older CPUs in 22H2 (but some old CPUs are kept for whatever weird business reason, compare 1511 to 22H2). The monthly updates are regular updates that only bump up the minor version numbers and installs in a few minutes. The big updates bump up the major version number, takes much longer to install, get rolled out slowly and often has a different startup screen (first start after update). They often also doesn't just install but need the user to approve - however this has changed a lot over time. Keep in mind that the last major Windows 10 version is almost 3 years old and since then it has just been "minor" monthly updates (that have contained some new features). Microsoft have really messed up the whole update process in regards to changing how it works, multiple times. Gone from major versions had a meaning (wow, new features!) to more of a rolling release where major updates often had only a few things (meh, just a new ISO spawn point) as most new features was rolled out in monthly updates.
For the genereal user, Windows 10 should just be "Windows 10" and not think about version numbers. The system should just update when the next major version has become stable (a few monthly updates added to it) and just mind it's own. Going to Windows Update and click update now, should give you the latest. This is just not how it worked with Windows 10 or 11. You often run into something blocking you - could be Microsoft that know you have a incompatible configuration (software/hardware) or some other reason that you can't figure out and at some point your Windows is not updated anymore because the Windows version you're on is not supported any longer.
I have not worked with Linux on a regular basis for a long time, so I might run into same weirdness (updates not working) in the future, but so far it has been a smoother. I do use Debian Stable, so it's not a big thrill ride.
Thank you!
You're welcome! Always glad to help ppl with these kinds of questions!
No updates for consumer versions of Win10. Including security ones. If on October 15th a zero-day exploit is out in the wild, Microsoft would not be obligated to patch it.
You said no updates for the consumer version, but there will be optional paid extended support available for consumer users who opt to pay for updates for a year.
Good point, I should have mentioned that. Although I think it would be reasonable to say that paying a subscription for security updates would be a non-starter for almost all of the home users.
You'd be surprised. I run a small IT business and I have many elderly customers on a fixed income. Linux is unfortunately not an option for most. Some have opted to buy a new or used W11 compatible PC, but many will be paying for extended support. For $30 for the whole year, it's much cheaper than a whole new computer.
Those pesky reboots will stop!
/s
Your PC will turn on. But you won't get security updates (meaning more and more dangerous to surf the web). Some software stop working too, because they stop supporting Windows 10. I think Steam will not work on it anymore, correct me if I am wrong. It will get worse over time, not right away on day one.
Preach! Everyone needs to switch over!
just happened, a few days ago I installed dual boot of EndeavourOS and OpenMandriva replacing Windows 7, on my potato mini PC. (Celeron 1007U, 8GB RAM, 512GB HDD)
Congratz. I see, EndeavourOS, a man of culture as well. :D But how did you came to OpenMandriva? It's not a usual distribution newcomers choose. Not because its hard to use, but because its a bit less popular. What made you chose this, just curious, not saying its bad or anything like that. I'm curious for the reason.
Hope someone goes over the libreoffice ui to simplify its workflows and fix multi monitor support by then. That youtuber who designed musescore's new version comes to mind
🤣 have to completely rethink their work environment 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Good Lord y'all love to ham it up.