this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
63 points (98.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8184 readers
627 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 2 points 28 minutes ago

What is “one of the first” supposed to mean? It’s definitely not the first. Weird way to put it.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

So Iran can’t but the US can? Is this plant going to be an acceptable target now that the US has entered the war?

[–] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

There is only one side here that is obsessed with terror attacks on civilian nuclear facilities and it's not Iran

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

that’s right. how ironic is it that Iran can’t but US can.

[–] Stubb@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Have you considered the following:

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

this is what american fascists do, yeah. it’s deplorable.

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Is it all for an AI computer?

[–] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml 2 points 14 hours ago

Of course that's how to make economy 🙂

[–] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 5 points 18 hours ago

Yeah isn't this the reactivation of Three Mile Island and it's specifically being pushed for by meta for their AI

Looks like it was Microsoft https://www.npr.org/2024/09/20/nx-s1-5120581/three-mile-island-nuclear-power-plant-microsoft-ai

But this seems actually different.

Seems like the governor just wants to push forward with new nuclear planets since the last one was shutdown only a few years ago. Apparently this severally effected the energy prices in NY.

Its still probably being pushed by AI companies but we (the us) don't really produce enough power for everything thats up and coming like electric cars.

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 1 points 17 hours ago

For TMI, yes. You could say that it's all computer!

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Can...can we build it after Trump leaves? I'd rather not have a target here.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Trump reduced the “red tape” to build this so it might just be dangerous on its own

Assuming it comes online in less than a decade and not drastically over budget

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 12 hours ago

A grift for the technocrats.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Eh, the newest generation of reactors are actually really safe. It's been a while since I've read up on them, but I believe that it's impossible for some of them to meltdown.

The red tape for building nuclear plants was based on the first few gen reactors, and needed to be reduced.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Thoughtfully reduced and changed. I don't trust that the red tape reduction in this case was thoughtful, though I will admit I haven't looked myself. With all the shit being thrown at the wall it's impossible to keep up, even though nuclear power generation is one of my areas of interest.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 2 points 19 hours ago

You realize all power plants are a "target" right?

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

building nuclear power plants take so long that he probably will be dead when it is done

[–] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml 2 points 19 hours ago

Burkina Faso will have gone nuclear by the time they finish this shit