this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
44 points (85.5% liked)

Programming

21290 readers
22 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Many programmers who start working on new personal open source projects wrongly assume that building something cool guarantees users, fans, and revenue will follow. Maybe it’s because they have seen too many cool stories of influencers on Twitter and believe it is true.

It's statements like these that remind me just how different the internet is for some people. I don't think I've ever strayed far outside of the "look at this cool thing I made!" parts of the open source community. The idea of chasing fame and monetization isn't really a thing in those circles, let alone "influencers" shilling content like that.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago

Most successful projects I've seen are: I needed/wanted X, so I made X and now I'm sharing it with you so you can use it and maybe help me out.

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Only posers create open source projects as a promotion tool

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Author admits they don't ask for donations and then use the lack of donation as evidence for their arguments. Amazing logic there.

Also whatever the fuck this is

By the way, next time you see a request for donations at any project, think about the reasoning in the head of the product owner.

Some of us ask for donations because we know people don't actually think about it. Fuck you for implying we're closer to being sellouts than you are.

This blog gives me right-libertarian vibes with its promotion of "open - core" shite and how focused it is on money.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Many people enjoy programming, you know. I've got like ten reasonably-sized projects and I haven't posted about them anywhere. Because I built them to scratch my own itch, both in terms of functionality I could use and the itch to build something, no matter what it is. I'm not wasting my time, because I'm doing something I enjoy.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Same here. Bold of anyone else to assume that I want to share my open source project. I don't mind if someone finds it, but it'll be a cold day in hell before I promote it. Haha.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, after writing that comment, I was thinking, if I do promote it, that means there's a certain expectation that I'll integrate or implement functionality that others want. At that point, it becomes less of an egoistic thing. And I'll be doing more communication and whatnot, therefore less programming.

Maybe that's the puzzle piece that OP is missing? If you don't promote it, you have practically no extra work compared to developing it under a proprietary license. In fact, it often reduces the workload, if you can just post it publicly without having to secure the repo.
And you don't incur costs from giving it away either. So, if you make sure to only put in the work that you want to put in in the first place, you have no disadvantage from publishing it with an open-source license.

[–] who@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago

Prelude to most of my projects:

  1. I want a tool that does X, with conditions Y, and without Z.
  2. I search for such a tool, and discover that it doesn't exist.
  3. I build it myself.

Epilogue:

I now have exactly the tool I wanted. It makes my life better all day, every day, with no foreseeable end.

Happy user.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It is bold of the author to assume that anything I have open sourced is useful to anyone besides me, much less profitable to a corporation.

Confused meme: You guys write useful code?

[–] groucho@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 days ago

Laughs in Arduino blinky lights and gameboy ASM

[–] RommieDroid@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yep definitely, If you open source when you are a small team or individual a company will steal your code and, with their massive teams, wipe the floor with you. That is why I like what Plausible Analytics (Google Alternative) is doing, https://plausible.io/blog/open-source-licenses there AGPL-3.0 licence scares big tech because by using code with it, you must open source all code using or related to the code you use, and they have the means to enforce that.

[–] atlien51@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I THOUGHT THE GUY ON THE LEFT WAS SHELDON FOR A MINUTE WTFFF

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

gnu-bazinga

[–] ksigley@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Is that SLC Punk ?