this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
62 points (95.6% liked)

Green Energy

3000 readers
133 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The newest, hottest power couple doesn’t live in Hollywood. It’s actually the marriage of solar panels and water reservoirs: Known as floating photovoltaics, or floatovoltaics, the devices bob on simple floats, generating power while providing shade that reduces evaporation.

One primary advantage of the technology is that you don’t have to clear trees to make way for solar farms. As an added bonus, the water cools the panels, increasing their efficiency. Research has shown that if societies deployed floatovoltaics in just a fraction of the lakes and reservoirs of the world, they could generate nearly a third of the amount of electricity that the United States uses in a year.

As floatovoltaic systems rapidly proliferate — the market is expected to grow an average of 23 percent each year between 2025 and 2030 — scientists are investigating how the technology might influence ecosystems. The shading, for instance, might stunt the growth of algae that some species eat — but at the same time, it might also prevent the growth of toxic algae. The floats might prevent waterbirds from landing — but also might provide habitat for them to hide from predators. By better understanding these dynamics, scientists say that if companies are willing, they can work with manufacturers to customize floatovoltaics to produce as much electricity as possible while also benefiting wildlife as much as possible.

“Renewable energy, low-carbon electricity, is a really good thing for us, but we shouldn’t be expanding it at the cost of biodiversity loss,” said Elliott Steele, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of California, Davis, and co-author of a recent paper about floatovoltaics and conservation in the journal Nature Water. “This is a great opportunity for us to increase our research and develop smart design ideas and better siting practices in order to have this happy marriage between a healthy, biodiverse ecosystem and renewable energy expansion.”

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Reservoirs have been doing this forever with plastic balls to prevent evaporation.

And to prevent birds landing.

[–] oneser@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago

I'm sorry. Why are we talking about biodiversity loss with solar? Who is cutting down forests or clearing land to put in panels?

I only see them on rooftops, car parks, farmland (where they have the benefit of adding shade.) etc.

I'm all for more deployment, but no need to shit on non-"floatovoltaics" - rad name btw

[–] yessikg@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Put them on canals first like they are trying out in California

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

An idea I had was to put them over the...not sure what the technical term is...the Panama canal's locks have these storage ponds that they flow some of the water into so the locks lose less water to the ocean per cycle. Panama is tropical, the sun is intense there, how many gallons of water are lost from those ponds to evaporation in a year? That'd be a great place to install solar power.

[–] yessikg@fedia.io 4 points 6 days ago

Makes a lot of sense, sadly the Panama canal is notorious for the tug of war between so many parties, so I really doubt they would get consensus to do it

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

India has been doing this too. And China.

[–] elmicha@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

Research has shown that if societies deployed floatovoltaics in just a fraction of the lakes and reservoirs of the world, they could generate nearly a third of the amount of electricity that the United States uses in a year.

That's a bit of a dumb statement, isn't it? Regardless if the area is 0.1% or 90%, the output is always the same.