#TheyDidntDoTheMath
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
-30 points (14.3% liked)
Unpopular Opinion
7832 readers
168 users here now
Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!
How voting works:
Vote the opposite of the norm.
If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.
Guidelines:
Tag your post, if possible (not required)
- If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
- If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].
Rules:
1. NO POLITICS
Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.
2. Be civil.
Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...
Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
5. No trolling.
This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.
6. Defend your opinion
This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Did you?
Burden of proof is on you, bro.
I provided my thoughts in unpopular opinions. There’s no burden here at all.
Furthermore, I made an asymptotic limiting behavior argument (e.g., the variable cost is lowest for renewable sources), which quite literally is math https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymptotic_analysis
The variable cost effect of renewable is quite well known, thus there is no real need to cite things, but here is a recent article https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/22/green-power-now-cheaper-than-fossil-fuels-un-reports-show
I am trying to discuss a clearly unpopular opinion in the fediverse; and am opening to changing my views. Your comments have clearly been well liked by the community but do you think they serve to create a positive community atmosphere? Or should we all strive to live in our own echo chambers?
If you make a claim about something then the burden of proof is on you to support it.
You make several assumptions here with zero supporting data, e.g. "people do not generally live where there is a lot of potential to generate green energy", "The more sources that can consume energy in remote areas the more incentives there are to build renewable energy sources.".
It creates demand for energy, but it doesn't actually produce anything. It's just proof of work math problems.
I don't think it's a net positive by itself. Maybe if you combine it with something else
Building in remote areas destroys the environment during the build and changes it while it’s in use.
Plenty of solar in the desert kills off the local fauna and diverts rainstorm water in such a way that it causes problems.
This is a good point. Do you think wind power has these same externalities? I agree a solar farm can create a large footprint
Yeah wind farms are massive construction projects that reengineer the area.
Alright, I'll skip right past the energy consumption issue of crypto and AI and the like..
Riddle me this...
If the future is supposed to be an entirely digital world, where only adults can have accounts (18 or 21 years old or whatever), then 5 year olds won't even have the right to go buy a simple candy bar, and high school students won't have any financial experience to even get started in life after they graduate.
So what future is there in crypto?
https://www.web3isgoinggreat.com/
Personal opinion, crypto is nothing but scammer garbage.
crypto is nothing but scammer garbage.
Damn, homie just tossed the blank meme image, and it totally fits without words!
👍
Wait for the bubble to pop. It always goes on for longer than one thinks.
where only adults can have accounts (18 or 21 years old or whatever), then 5 year olds won’t even have the right to go buy a simple candy bar, and high school students won’t have any financial experience to even get started in life after they graduate.
That's like saying only adults are allowed to use money. In a world with digital money, of course children will have to be able to use digital money.
Show me evidence that children are allowed to use crypto, or that they can even remember enough of the alphabet to remember their password..
evidence children are allowed to use crypto? They can use phones and tablets, the UI on crypto is just an app. Therefore they can use crypto.
Even seen a kid with a few coins buy candy? Ever see a kid use a tap to pay?
I'm not sure where your ideas of "allowed" are coming from, but in reality everybody participates in the economy however its transacted.
I know Iceland’s geothermal is a hot spot for mining crypto-currency because it costs absolutely next to nothing. When you’re running massive mining centers off of the earth’s burps there is opportunity to turn a massive profit.
Now, do I think it’s incentivizing a large shift in the production of energy? I’m not sure. Are crypto-bros reinvesting their earnings into renewables research and infrastructure? Or are they buying gas guzzling sports cars and jet setting to all the best parties?
At this point in time, a lot of the “green crypto” feels more like greenwashing than actual ethical development. But who knows, maybe someday that will change?
The energy used by mining Bitcoin is the energy required to hold back human corruption and fraud. In other words, it's so costly because humanity is so shit. Fiat, by comparison, is cheap, but it is also inadequate at holding people back from corrupting their money.