this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
294 points (95.7% liked)

World News

48889 readers
1635 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ninjabard@lemmy.world 98 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Looks like a great time to continue never using TikTok.

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It was good. Until they shut down. It came back wrong

[–] ninjabard@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It ushered in an era of drastically falling attention spans and fostered increased device addiction. It was never good.

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (6 children)

It allowed Gen z to connect and mobilize protests in a way that hadn't ever been seen before. Sharing and continuing to share information that was relevant to movements after the media stopped paying attention. It had it's problems, it had its uses.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 days ago

We need better alternatives, something that's definitely not under control of some business

[–] ninjabard@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

It also allowed protestors to be tracked and spread misinformation in a way we had never seen. It was the problem.

[–] PattyP@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Are there a lot of active gen z protestors relative to other generations near you? I’m on the younger end of millennials, and where I live I see way more people older than me at protests than people younger than me or close to my age. Maybe just a quirk of my city I guess.

[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 days ago

Older millennial, and ditto. It's mostly older, with a smattering of 30-somethings with their kids

The bad outweighs the good. Fuck TikTok all the way. Hated it from the very beginning when it was called Musically.

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

source? bc gen z over here are doing just fine using the usual stuff

[–] Suluhara@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago

Gen Z already had the internet. They could've shared shit at any time and hosted it as long as they wanted after the media attention without using TikTok.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 91 points 2 days ago (4 children)

That’s a different way of saying “TikTok appoints Israeli as its Hate Speech Manager.” IDF service is mandatory.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can still refuse. You'd have to sit in prison, but that's worth it at this point

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Definitely. But everyone who is alive who has held Israeli citizenship is either an (ick) IDF soldier, or is (like this person) an ex-IDF soldier.

Although that makes me think: do those who have already started rabbinical training also need to do their 2 years?

I'm Israeli, didn't do military service, knew many people who also didn't do it.

don't get me wrong, the IDF wants you to join, but if you don't want to, they can't make you

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

This is not true. Haredi jews were exempt from the draft until last year. And Arabs Muslims or Chrisrians, even if they are citizens, are not drafted at all.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mandatory or not, a past committing genocide and being taught to see people of a certain nationality as inherently subhuman while going all in on DARVO gaslighting should still exclude you from being in charge of anything related to bigotry and hate speech.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

I agree. Is that the case with this person?

I know a few ex-IDF soldiers. One served from 1967-69 in Records hunting down artwork stolen by the Nazis. Went on to become a professor who taught world literature. Left Israel in the 70s to live and work somewhere more multicultural. Still not someone I’d recommend for this position, but “ex-IDF” covers a lot of people, some of whom might be very qualified for the position.

[–] slowcakes@programming.dev 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Is it mandatory for woman?

[–] JGrffn@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Right? Very politically charged title. Death to the IDF and all, but come on.

he's the perfect hate speech manager, because I already hate him

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean... who else has more experience with hate speech?

[–] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

A too-long red tie

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago