Not sure what the point is here exactly. Every single country that has ever had a revolution had to deal with these things.
196
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
The point is that if you convince yourself there's no chance of succeeding, then maybe you won't feel so guilty about not even trying.
Yes let's downplay the US military like it's just any other. No biggie
the military is what the ghandi trap is for. one doesn't defeat them in combat, we be brutalized by them publicly in a way that radicalizes enough of the remaining population that they have to kill everyone in order to prevent the revolution.
so in order for it to work you have to lay the groundwork beforehand teaching people how to have empathy for the victims of systematic violence. in which your enemy isn't the military but propogandists.
yes, that's why most revolutions result in dictators.
The other thing to consider, and maybe this is already addressed, is that there's a stunningly large proportion of the population that is not only okay with this, they want it. And it's not a situation where those people who approve or simply don't care are segregated out by regions, they're literally living next doors and up stairs. They're cousins and sisters and fathers and bosses and coworkers and so on. This is not some super easy "why doesn't the larger of the two simply eat the other?" kind of situation, and no matter how hard anybody wants to try and reduce it down to that, sorry, that's just now how things work.
So more in line with Nazi Germany than confederate 1860s USA
To get that kind of momentum going against a literal police state would be difficult to say the least. Such a movement would also likely be smothered in it's crib by the surveillance state we built ostensibly to keep us safe from the terrorist boogeyman that America created.
Even if the revolutionaries win, there's no guarantee that the government that comes as a result would be better in any way. Great warriors rarely make great rulers.
If the US collapses before I die. I can die happy.
This is an evil country. It makes war on the world. It threatens the world via control of the reserve currency. To say nothing of the abuses it visits on its own citizens.
Total collapse. Balkanization. Don't care how. No expectation of surviving the fall. But as long as it falls I can die happy knowing that life on this planet has a brighter future than it did with the US at the till.
They should just disunite and become 51 independent states. Then they don't have to project their internal differences onto other countries any more.
I agree, Balkanization would be for the best at this point; there's no longer any legal solution
Every state has its own government and the feds have become more trouble than they are worth.
I should add that even if the states get a right to secede, but don't use it, that improves people's lives.
Because the states can constantly pressure the federal government to be nice to the states or the states will secede. This way, the federal government is forced to treat states somewhat better, if it wants to retain power.
Laws don't mean anything any more, so states should just go ahead and dew it regardless of legality.
if mamdani wins he has the opportunity to do something incredibly funny
as long as at leadt one state fully commits to doing the dew. Baja Blast style.
Most of the people here live paycheck to paycheck and can't afford a $500 emergency.
So the risk of even just getting arrested, and held in custody for a week, would be enough to ruin one's life.
That puts a damper on protesting, until you or your family are directly impacted. It also inhibits willingness to strike.
And it also explains why so many protesters are of retirement age -- they don't have a job to lose if they miss work unexpectedly for a few days.
In a lot of ways, we were already conquered.
Wow, I'm three days late, sorry.
But of course no one can fight back alone. This is why you have to start grassroots and build up to national movements. Start with mutual aid: helping members of the community with the expectation of being helped in return. Food drives, worker's co-ops, free daycare services, etc. Once we have community we can push the issue when the time is ripe (e.g., a BLM-level protest). Labor strikes, rental strikes, expropriating food and clothes etc.
Ultimately the same for all other authoritarian states with a "docile" population. Fragile living conditions threaten their livelyhoods, preventing many from joining the fight.
Until those fragile living conditions are threatened. Then people will think "I'm fucked if I do nothing and might not be fucked if I do something. So I will do something."
Forces of capital have been trying to find the level just above the tipping point for many decades.
What do you think they want all your data for? Yes, it's to find out what you like to buy, but more importantly the concept is to figure out what levels of discomfort, disappointment or despair you can take before you stop buying the product.
From new phones to life-saving medication for your spouse to how many monthly fees your bank can get away with charging you. They aren't coming up with prices from nowhere, the money doesn't represent labor and parts, it represents an adjusted level where enough people will reach before they become a problem.
Violent revolutions almost always result in bad governments for exactly this reason, i.e. it's only fringe idealists that get it together enough to lead one, and such people are usually terrible at doing actual grown-up governing.
It's why it's so infuriating to see right-wingers claim that basic social safety nets and tackling inequality are Communism, because it's like, if you want Communism then pushing half the population towards that level of desperation is exactly how you end up with it.
We are in the middle of a revolution, just not one of, for, or by the people.
Now that corporations are people, they are "fighting for their rights" to make obscene profits; it's a "Cash is King" plutocratic revolution.
And before all, who is willing to intentionally miss (perhaps forever) the remaining episodes of their favorite show to make that all happen?
Kurzeghast(sp) has a great little video that ends with essentially "there is literally nothing stopping us from having a better healthy post scarcity society but ourselves. There is no reason for it except for the mindset that perpetuates that we can't"
There are also lots and lots of guns wielded by lots of misguided poor people being paid by very rich people who have nearly infinite resources at their disposal.
I'm not saying the conclusion is wrong - but it's not easy either.
Not to mention, "how is someone supposed to organize any of this without getting disappeared by the FBI or CIA."
Americans don't know how to cooperate, they're raised with a "me first" mentality. They can't fathom the thought of laying down their lives for their countrymen, so unless you propose to them a revolution where every one of them gets treated as the main character and everybody else as the supporting cast, they won't lift a finger.
Also "the fellow countryman" being racist and fully supporting of the whole process doesn't exactly help with motivation.
Listen, at least tear it down for the rest of the world, what you do after that is up to you, but for the love of god just stop the existence of the usa
They always talk how they need guns to prevent tyranny and they are in a tyranny for over 6 months now and nothing...
That was never the reason.
Like anything else, conservatives only want things because smarter people suggest to them that they don't need them.
Guns, unhealthy food, horse paste, religion, fossil fuel power, gendered bathrooms...
Everything is pigheaded contradiction like a 2 year old.
My biggest fear is what emerges after.
No, no, don't you know, this time it'll be different. Every time a government was violently overthrown by the local population what came after was either dictatorship or warlordism. But this time it'll be different! Trust me, bro!
In many successful revolutions, an army was a part of uprising. Serving in the army does not make you any less of a voter.
A general strike for 2 weeks. Will bring the economy to near destruction and force change
I'm rapidly approaching the point where I don't care if anyone has a plan or not.
And the majority of people are libs and conservatives that think ”capitalism isn’t perfect, but it’s the best we got.”
I'm not sure the answer to this question but I'll be ready with my de-ICE-ing agent.
People revolt when they can't take any more. They don't need a plan for what comes next, they just need a critical mass of desperation and anger. Too many people still feel that they have more left to lose.
"How would they deal with the army?" Probaby even better then other folks in shitty technicals like Afghanistan and Vietnam did to be honest. They aren't going to nuke American rebels because then they'd win a big radioactive pile of shit. Think they'd shoot missiles in NYC? Fat fucking chance. Even tanks rolling down Main street is gonna set off alarms.